Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 5 reviews
Sumitomo Tour+ LSW looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Dynapro H/T vs Sumitomo Tour+ LSW — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro H/T is ahead, 52–34
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Dynapro H/T +1736Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T Tour+ LSW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 47 (est.) Reviews found online 45 19 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 53
Tour+ LSW: 60% × 47.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.7 = 36
No road tests of dry for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Tour+ LSW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
54
Wet
Dynapro H/T +1836Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T Tour+ LSW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 45 (est.) Reviews found online 47 24 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 54
Tour+ LSW: 60% × 44.6 (est.) + 40% × 23.5 = 36
No road tests of wet for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Tour+ LSW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T Tour+ LSW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 47 – Dynapro H/T: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 56
No road tests of snow for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
53
Comfort
Dynapro H/T +2132Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T Tour+ LSW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 45 14 Dynapro H/T: 40% × 64.7 (est.) + 60% × 45.1 = 53
Tour+ LSW: 40% × 58.9 (est.) + 60% × 13.5 = 32
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro H/T or Tour+ LSW. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
Dynapro H/T +2033Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T Tour+ LSW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 47 (est.) Reviews found online 44 11 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 53
Tour+ LSW: 60% × 47 (est.) + 40% × 11.2 = 33
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Tour+ LSW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
43
Handling (owners)
Dynapro H/T +2419Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T Tour+ LSW Reviews found online 43 19
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro H/T | Sumitomo Tour+ LSW |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | 34 |
| Dry | 53 | 36 |
| Wet | 54 | 36 |
| Snow | 56 | – |
| Comfort | 53 | 32 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 33 |
| Handling (owners) | 43 | 19 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro H/T
Tour+ LSW
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro H/T
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and quiet ride
- High comfort and smooth highway performance
- Balanced wet and dry braking for casual driving
Cons
- Terrible winter and snow traction due to hard rubber compound
- Poor wet traction leading to wheel spin on acceleration
- Severe balancing and out-of-round issues reported by some users
Tire B Tour+ LSW
Pros
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Competent performance in rain and snow for some users
- Cost-effective alternative to premium brands
Cons
- Severe and persistent vibration issues
- Difficulty maintaining wheel balance
- Reports of structural belt defects and blowouts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro H/T | B · Sumitomo Tour+ LSW |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 5 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro H/T
Sumitomo Tour+ LSW
Winner: Hankook Dynapro H/T — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro H/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Sumitomo Tour+ LSW rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Dynapro H/T scores 43 vs 19 on handling.
Hankook Dynapro H/T scores 53 vs 32 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro H/T scores 53 vs 33 on treadwear.
Hankook Dynapro H/T scores 54 vs 36 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro H/T or Tour+ LSW?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro H/T or Tour+ LSW?
Hankook Dynapro H/T, 54 vs 36 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro H/T or Tour+ LSW?
Hankook Dynapro H/T, 53 vs 36 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro H/T or Tour+ LSW?
Hankook Dynapro H/T, 53 vs 32 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro H/T or Tour+ LSW?
Hankook Dynapro H/T, 53 vs 33 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology