Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 10 reviews
Hankook Icebear W300 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Icebear W300 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 164 owner reviews. How we score
Crugen HT51 is ahead, 73–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Crugen HT51 +1274Why this score
Source Icebear W300 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 58 77 Icebear W300: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 62
Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74
No road tests of dry for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
62
Wet
Crugen HT51 +1476Why this score
Source Icebear W300 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 59 78 Icebear W300: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62
Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76
No road tests of wet for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison70Why this score
Source Icebear W300 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 70 Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
61
Comfort
Crugen HT51 +970Why this score
Source Icebear W300 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 57 71 Icebear W300: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61
Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Icebear W300 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison72Why this score
Source Icebear W300 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 79 Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 72
No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Crugen HT51 +465Why this score
Source Icebear W300 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 57 76 Icebear W300: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61
Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.3 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Crugen HT51 +1374Why this score
Source Icebear W300 Crugen HT51 Reviews found online 61 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Icebear W300 | Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 73 |
| Dry | 62 | 74 |
| Wet | 62 | 76 |
| Snow | – | 70 |
| Comfort | 61 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Icebear W300
73
/ 100
Crugen HT51
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Icebear W300
Pros
- Outstanding traction and mobility in deep and compacted snow
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- High value-to-performance ratio in winter conditions
Cons
- Weak performance in wet and slushy conditions
- Rapid tread wear, particularly in warmer temperatures
- Limited dry-weather feedback and handling precision
Tire B Crugen HT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
- Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction
Cons
- Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
- Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
- Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Icebear W300 | B · Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 44 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 12.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Hankook Icebear W300
73
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HT51
Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Icebear W300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 76 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 62 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 61 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Icebear W300
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Icebear W300 or Crugen HT51?
Which is better in the wet, Icebear W300 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Icebear W300 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Icebear W300 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Icebear W300 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 65 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology