tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 14 + 277 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy 4S is ahead, 68–47

Check price on Amazon · Kinergy 4S or Crugen HP71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire AHankook

Kinergy 4S

All Season

± 8

Tests 68 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 14 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire BKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 277 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Kinergy 4S +25
    44
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SCrugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests70≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online6731

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 67.2 = 69

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.5 = 44

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Kinergy 4S +22
    51
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SCrugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online7144

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 71 = 73

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.1 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 51

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Kinergy 4S +17
    53
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SCrugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests66≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7741

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 76.6 = 70

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Kinergy 4S +23
    44
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SCrugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6632

    Kinergy 4S: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.2 = 44

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    Kinergy 4S +6
    54
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SCrugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests56≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)36

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 56.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 60

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.8 = 54

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Kinergy 4S +26
    37
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SCrugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests63≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online6319

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 62.8 + 40% × 62.9 = 63

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.2 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Kinergy 4S +13
    51
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SCrugen HP71
    Reviews found online6451
  8. 67

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SCrugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests67–
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Kinergy 4SKumho Crugen HP71
Relative Score 68 47
Dry 69 44
Wet 73 51
Snow 70 53
Comfort 67 44
Noise 60 54
Treadwear 63 37
Handling (owners) 64 51
Efficiency 67 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Kinergy 4S

± 8

Crugen HP71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryKinergy 4SCrugen HP71ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #12/30 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy 4S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
  • Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
  • Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S review

Tire B Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Kinergy 4S

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/Ioniq5 ·1 upvote ·2026-08-30

“The HP71 are actually the OE tire for several trim/MY combinations for the Ioniq 5 and EV6 and they're decent tires. The longest lasting tire is the Defender 2, with the trade off of mediocre traction. I run the Nokian One because it's a batter balance of traction and tread wear than the defender but still quiet and very long-lasting.”
r/volvoc40 ·61 upvotes ·2026-07-08

“Yet Another C40 Wheel Downsize Report I decided to join the crowd in downsizing from the factory 20" wheels to 18" Wheels: Voxx Paso Tires: Kumho Crugen EV HP71 (currently on sale for $500 for a set of 4) I was a bit worried about wheel fitment because of the large brake calipers, but they fit without issue, standard install. I've only put about 100 miles on them so far, but the ride is much more comfortable and these new tires are SO much quieter than the old tires that were installed when I bought the vehicle (CPO): Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 I don't have enough data yet to see if this will make a range improvement, but I imagine it will as they're skinnier tires and EV optimized. So far I'm impressed with the Kumho's, especially for the price they're offering. And I think these new wheels look pretty decent! Read more”
r/Cadillac ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28

“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy 4S B · Kumho Crugen HP71
CategoryAll SeasonSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available6763
Rim diameters13″ – 18″16″ – 22″
Tread depth—9.9/32″
UTQG500 - 600 A A640 A A
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common88

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy 4S

Kumho Crugen HP71

Winner: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 63 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 69 vs 44 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 67 vs 44 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 73 vs 51 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kinergy 4S or Crugen HP71?

Which is better in the wet, Kinergy 4S or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 73 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy 4S or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 69 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Kinergy 4S or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 70 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Kinergy 4S or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 60 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Kinergy 4S or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 67 vs 44 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Kinergy 4S or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 63 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology