tirewheelguide

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 93 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus V12 evo2 leads, 69–65 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Neova AD07 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Ventus V12 evo2 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7166

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Ventus V12 evo2 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests69≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7366

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 72.8 = 71

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Ventus V12 evo2 +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6554

    Ventus V12 evo2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.9 = 66

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Noise

    Ventus V12 evo2 +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)61

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 73

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 64

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    Ventus V12 evo2 +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5853

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 61

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus V12 evo2 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Reviews found online7067
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Ventus V12 evo2Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
Relative Score 69 65
Dry 71 67
Wet 71 67
Snow – 62
Comfort 66 59
Noise 73 64
Treadwear 61 58
Handling (owners) 70 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Ventus V12 evo2

± 8

ADVAN Neova AD07

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus V12 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
  • Comfortable ride with low initial road noise

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
  • Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
  • Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo2 review

Tire B ADVAN Neova AD07

Pros

  • Stunning and reliable dry grip
  • Incredibly progressive breakaway behavior that is easy to control
  • Exceptional steering feedback and stability at high speeds

Cons

  • High price point relative to overall value
  • Subpar wet-weather traction and traction loss under heavy acceleration
  • Noticeable road noise ('rumble') and a stiff, uncomfortable ride quality
All owner themes in the ADVAN Neova AD07 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available381
Rim diameters15″ – 21″16″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG320 - 380 A - AA A180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07

Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better noise, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 73 vs 64 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 66 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 73 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 66 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus V12 evo2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 61 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology