Tests 80 · 15 tests Owners 79 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test (snow handling)
Head-to-head
Updated
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 15 + 3 road tests and 32 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Quadraxer 3 is ahead, 80–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 69 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 3 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
85
Dry
Quadraxer 3 +1966Why this score
Source Quadraxer 3 Blizzak LM001 EVO Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 3 tests 89 66 Reviews found online 79 68 Quadraxer 3: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.5 = 85
Blizzak LM001 EVO: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 67.6 = 66
-
82
Wet
Quadraxer 3 +379Why this score
Source Quadraxer 3 Blizzak LM001 EVO Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 3 tests 82 82 Reviews found online 82 75 Quadraxer 3: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 81.8 = 82
Blizzak LM001 EVO: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 75 = 79
-
82
Snow
Quadraxer 3 +2557Why this score
Source Quadraxer 3 Blizzak LM001 EVO Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 3 tests 86 53 Reviews found online 75 63 Quadraxer 3: 60% × 86.3 + 40% × 75.4 = 82
Blizzak LM001 EVO: 60% × 52.9 + 40% × 63 = 57
-
74
Comfort
Quadraxer 3 +668Why this score
Source Quadraxer 3 Blizzak LM001 EVO Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests 61 ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 82 68 Quadraxer 3: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 82 = 74
Blizzak LM001 EVO: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 68.1 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM001 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
72
Noise
Blizzak LM001 EVO +476Why this score
Source Quadraxer 3 Blizzak LM001 EVO Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 3 tests 76 83 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Quadraxer 3: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72
Blizzak LM001 EVO: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76
No owner ratings of noise for Quadraxer 3 or Blizzak LM001 EVO. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
76
Treadwear
Quadraxer 3 +769Why this score
Source Quadraxer 3 Blizzak LM001 EVO Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests 72 72 Reviews found online 80 65 Quadraxer 3: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 80.1 = 76
Blizzak LM001 EVO: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 65.2 = 69
-
77
Handling (owners)
Quadraxer 3 +869Why this score
Source Quadraxer 3 Blizzak LM001 EVO Reviews found online 77 69 -
77
Efficiency
Quadraxer 3 +473Why this score
Source Quadraxer 3 Blizzak LM001 EVO Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 3 tests 77 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kleber Quadraxer 3 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 69 |
| Dry | 85 | 66 |
| Wet | 82 | 79 |
| Snow | 82 | 57 |
| Comfort | 74 | 68 |
| Noise | 72 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 76 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 69 |
| Efficiency | 77 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Quadraxer 3
69
/ 100
Blizzak LM001 EVO
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Quadraxer 3 | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #7/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 95% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #12/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 98% #18/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 99% #5/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 96% #3/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% #15/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 94% #14/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 98% #10/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 93% #5/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 91% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% #6/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 95% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #6/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 74% #12/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 60% #9/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 92% #11/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 87% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 68% #12/15 · 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 85% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #6/15 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | #3/20 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 68% #8/15 · 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 76% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 | #10/51 2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Quadraxer 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low noise levels
- Strong wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
- Reliable traction and safety in light snow and winter conditions
Cons
- Tread compound can harden or degrade in performance over multiple years
- Increased road noise and roar reported at higher highway speeds (above 135 km/h)
- Occasional reports of reduced grip or cracking as the tire reaches the end of its lifespan
Tire B Blizzak LM001 EVO
Pros
- Superb wet braking and performance in cold, wet conditions
- Sharp and responsive steering feel
- Very quiet operation when new
Cons
- Fast tread wear, particularly in dry and warmer conditions
- Below average snow performance and limited resistance to aquaplaning
- Increased tire noise inside the cabin as the tire ages
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kleber Quadraxer 3 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 71 | 5 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Kleber Quadraxer 3
69
/ 100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
Winner: Kleber Quadraxer 3 — better snow, dry and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Kleber Quadraxer 3 scores 82 vs 57 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kleber Quadraxer 3 scores 85 vs 66 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kleber Quadraxer 3 scores 77 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kleber Quadraxer 3 scores 76 vs 69 on treadwear.
Tire A · Kleber Quadraxer 3
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Quadraxer 3 or Blizzak LM001 EVO?
Which is better in the wet, Quadraxer 3 or Blizzak LM001 EVO?
Kleber Quadraxer 3, 82 vs 79 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Quadraxer 3 or Blizzak LM001 EVO?
Kleber Quadraxer 3, 85 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Quadraxer 3 or Blizzak LM001 EVO?
Kleber Quadraxer 3, 82 vs 57 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Quadraxer 3 or Blizzak LM001 EVO?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO, 76 vs 72 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Quadraxer 3 or Blizzak LM001 EVO?
Kleber Quadraxer 3, 74 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Quadraxer 3 or Blizzak LM001 EVO?
Kleber Quadraxer 3, 76 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Quadraxer 3 or Blizzak LM001 EVO?
Kleber Quadraxer 3, 77 vs 73 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology