Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 277 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 277 + 256 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Sport A/S+ is ahead, 72–48
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 277 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 256 reviews
“/i got these for my 2009 base YOKOHAMA ADVAN SPORT A/S+ they ride quite and smooth”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | ADVAN Sport A/S+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 53 (est.) | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 32 | 79 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 31.5 = 44
ADVAN Sport A/S+: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for ADVAN Sport A/S+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | ADVAN Sport A/S+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 57 (est.) | ≈ 76 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 45 | 80 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 52
ADVAN Sport A/S+: 60% × 75.8 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 77
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
No road tests of wet for ADVAN Sport A/S+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | ADVAN Sport A/S+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 41 | 59 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
ADVAN Sport A/S+: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 64
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport A/S+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | ADVAN Sport A/S+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 63 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 33 | 75 |
Crugen HP71: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.1 = 45
ADVAN Sport A/S+: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.2 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71 or ADVAN Sport A/S+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | ADVAN Sport A/S+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 36 | 70 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 36.3 = 54
ADVAN Sport A/S+: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 68
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or ADVAN Sport A/S+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | ADVAN Sport A/S+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 50 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 19 | 73 |
Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.7 (est.) + 40% × 18.6 = 37
ADVAN Sport A/S+: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Sport A/S+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Crugen HP71 | ADVAN Sport A/S+ |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 51 | 71 |
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 72 |
| Dry | 44 | 75 |
| Wet | 52 | 77 |
| Snow | 53 | 64 |
| Comfort | 45 | 73 |
| Noise | 54 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Crugen HP71
ADVAN Sport A/S+
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
“Kumho Crugen HP71 235/50R19XL 103V BSW ($132.44/each) Total: $264.88 Kumho Crugen EV HP71 255/45R19XL 104V BSW ($287.70/each Gigatires about a month ago I feel like they're just as good as the Continentals that came with the car It's crazy that these EVS have different size tires front and rear, prevents rotating tires for even wear. It's also surprising that the cost difference from the front the rear was so much different. It was also like that with numerous other manufacturers. I also drive about 24,000 mi a year, so we'll see if they hold up.”
“Tire wear on original 2024 KUMHO Grugen HP71 EV Full disclosure - I drive like a hyper-miling grandmother, always in ECO mode. Leased this Wind RWD 2 years ago. Original tires read: KUMHO Grugen HP71 EV 235/55 R19 101H Treadwear 500. Traction A Temperature A. Southern California. At 12k miles my tires have 3/32 tread left. These tires if purchased have a 60k or so tread wear warranty - which does not apply to tires "originally equipped". I did not check these tires when car was new. Has anyone experienced this ?”
“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
Based on 52 community posts
Community discussions view the Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+ favorably as a competent ultra-high-performance all-season tire that delivers smooth, quiet comfort and dependable wet and cold-weather handling. Drivers highlight its value compared to pricier competitors, though some note limits under high horsepower, question winter capabilities, or report premature tread wear and chunking.
“If you want a very good (Michelin or better type), smooth, quite, great in rain, longer lasting tire and less expensive, get the P7 A/S Plus 3. If you want a tire that is more performance oriented that is the same plus, get the Yokohama Advan Sport A/S+. The Yok handles excellent and impressive and is going to last longer than all the other performance tires. The P Zero AS 3 just is a bit better than the former P Zeros which all wore out super fast. There is already comments from some that used it longer term that it in fact wore extremely fast still. It's labeled as a "Ultra High performance" tire.”
“/i got these for my 2009 base YOKOHAMA ADVAN SPORT A/S+ they ride quite and smooth”
“Yokohama Advan Sport A/S+ Tires shot? Hello all. Question for you, I got these in June of 2021. (KIA Forte5 EX 215/45 R17) They have 28,500 miles on them, and are rated for 55k miles. I hit a nail and went to Discount Tire to get them plugged. They said the tires were shot (even though they have 4mm left on them) due to chunking. I bought them at the dealership I got my car at, and they also confirmed they were shot and needed replaced. However, the dealer only covered them with a 2 year warranty, so won't help to replace prorating them or anything. Both places said it looks like I either ride on gravel roads often or corner too hard. I live outside of Raleigh, no gravel roads... and I don't know that I've ever corned too hard, as I never hear them squeal nor would drive the fool with my daughter and/or wife in the car. Is it worth contacting Yokohama? Is something else wrong with my car? Am I doing something wrong? If I were to get new all season tires, what would you recommend? TIA for any info / advice.”
Based on 19 community posts
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Ultra High Performance All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 63 | 65 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 55,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Kumho Crugen HP71
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+ — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+ scores 71 vs 37 on treadwear.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+ scores 75 vs 44 on dry.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+ scores 73 vs 45 on comfort.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+ scores 77 vs 52 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+, 77 vs 52 on our wet score.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+, 75 vs 44 on our dry score.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+, 64 vs 53 on our snow score.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+, 68 vs 54 on our noise score.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+, 73 vs 45 on our comfort score.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport A/S+, 71 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology