Yokohama Parada Spec-2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP91 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 839 + 118 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HP91 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP91
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP91

Summer

Tests 68 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 839 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Parada Spec-2 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP91Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests64≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7775

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 63.8 + 40% × 76.7 = 69

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Crugen HP91 +12
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP91Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests70≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7858

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 77.8 = 73

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Comfort

    Crugen HP91 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP91Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7262

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP91 or Parada Spec-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP91Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Crugen HP91. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 63

    Treadwear

    Crugen HP91 +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP91Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6059

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 63

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HP91 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP91Parada Spec-2
    Reviews found online7369
Scores at a glance
Kumho Crugen HP91 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HP91Yokohama Parada Spec-2
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 69 73
Wet 73 61
Comfort 70 65
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 63 62
Handling (owners) 73 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Crugen HP91

Parada Spec-2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrugen HP91Parada Spec-2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/8 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test #8/8 2013 Auto Bild Performance Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP91

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry traction providing high confidence
  • Competitive, budget-friendly pricing compared to tier-1 premium brands
  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers or heavy vehicle owners
  • Occasional complaints regarding poor performance in deep snow or ice
  • Minor instances of increased road noise or vibration for a few users
All owner themes in the Crugen HP91 review

Tire B Parada Spec-2

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
  • Excellent value for money and aggressive tread design
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable breakaway limits in the dry

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
  • Fast tread wear due to the soft rubber compound
  • Noticeable road noise at cruising speeds
All owner themes in the Parada Spec-2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP91 B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available34—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG420 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP91

Yokohama Parada Spec-2

Narrow edge: Kumho Crugen HP91 — better wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Parada Spec-2 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 73 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 70 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Parada Spec-2 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP91
Tire B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP91 or Parada Spec-2?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP91 or Parada Spec-2?

Kumho Crugen HP91, 73 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP91 or Parada Spec-2?

Yokohama Parada Spec-2, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP91 or Parada Spec-2?

Kumho Crugen HP91, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP91 or Parada Spec-2?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology