tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Vredestein Quatrac 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 164 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or Quatrac 2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews

Vredestein Quatrac 2
Tire BVredestein

Quatrac 2

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Quatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7769

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Quatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7873

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Crugen HT51 +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Quatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7064

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Quatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7170

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    Quatrac 2: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or Quatrac 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Quatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online79–

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Quatrac 2 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Quatrac 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7671

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.3 = 65

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +13
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Quatrac 2
    Reviews found online7461
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Vredestein Quatrac 2
Relative Score 72 69
Dry 74 69
Wet 76 72
Snow 70 66
Comfort 70 70
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 65 69
Handling (owners) 74 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HT51

± 8

Quatrac 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B Quatrac 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
  • Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Higher road noise levels compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight decrease in fuel economy
  • Perceived lack of sidewall rigidity and road feedback
All owner themes in the Quatrac 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Vredestein Quatrac 2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth12.5/32″—
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Vredestein Quatrac 2

Narrow edge: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac 2 if treadwear matters most to you. Vredestein Quatrac 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 76 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 66 on snow.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HT51 or Quatrac 2?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Quatrac 2?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Quatrac 2?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 74 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HT51 or Quatrac 2?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 66 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Quatrac 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Quatrac 2?

Vredestein Quatrac 2, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology