tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Yokohama AVID TOURING-S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 164 + 85 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–67

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7767

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7867

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Crugen HT51 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7059

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7166

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    AVID TOURING-S: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7969

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 72

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    AVID TOURING-S +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7670

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.3 = 65

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51AVID TOURING-S
    Reviews found online74–
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Relative Score 72 67
Dry 74 67
Wet 76 68
Snow 70 63
Comfort 70 67
Noise 72 67
Treadwear 65 68
Handling (owners) 74 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HT51

± 7

AVID TOURING-S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B AVID TOURING-S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4428
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 17″
Tread depth12.5/32″11/32″
UTQG720 A A620 A B
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi80,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallWhitewall
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common88

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better wet, dry and snow. Pick the Yokohama AVID TOURING-S if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 76 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 72 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology