Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs Nitto Invo — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Invo leads, 61–59 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS91

Summer

Tests 76 · 6 tests Owners 47 · 485 reviews

“Follow up on new wheels/tires for ZHP Well new wheels and tires are on aswell as aligned. I love the tire and fitment setup but really do not like the gunmetal grey color especially on imola. I will feel it out for a while but probably eventually powder coat to OEM silver. Wheels specs are 18 x 8.5 x ET50 with 255/35/18 Kuhmo Ecsta PS91 all around. -2.5 camber in the front and -2.8 in the rear.”

Tire BNitto

Invo

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 38 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Ecsta PS91 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)76–
    Reviews found online5764
  2. 69

    Wet

    Ecsta PS91 +7
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)77–
    Reviews found online5560
  3. 38

    Snow

    Invo +14
    52
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Reviews found online1740
  4. 61

    Comfort

    Invo +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Reviews found online5362
  5. 66

    Noise

    Invo +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)75–
    Reviews found online5475
  6. 49

    Treadwear

    Invo +9
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Reviews found online3753
  7. 57

    Handling

    Invo +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Reviews found online5762
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs Nitto Invo: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS91Nitto Invo
Relative Score 59 61
Dry 68 65
Wet 69 62
Snow 38 52
Comfort 61 65
Noise 66 70
Treadwear 49 58
Handling 57 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta PS91

Invo

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS91

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip providing high confidence during spirited driving
  • Significantly more affordable than premium flagship alternatives while offering comparable performance
  • Stiff sidewalls enhance steering response, cornering stability, and feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly with aggressive driving or on heavier vehicles
  • Stiff sidewalls result in a firmer, less comfortable ride that transmits road imperfections
  • Tendency to tramline or follow road grooves on straight highways
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS91 review

Tire B Invo

Pros

  • Exceptional initial ride comfort and smoothness
  • Very quiet and low road noise when new
  • Strong dry traction and cornering grip for spirited driving

Cons

  • Dramatically reduced wet and dry grip as the tire wears down
  • Rapid tread wear and limited overall longevity
  • Develops severe road noise, whining, or harsh vibrations over time
All owner themes in the Invo review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Mixed

The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is widely praised as an affordable, budget-friendly summer tire with attractive styling and respectable wet or daily street performance compared to pricier rivals like Michelin. However, several users express frustration with poor tread life, rapid wear, and insufficient grip or heat endurance under hard driving and track conditions. Others also note issues with sketchy handling, flat-spotting, or vibration when cold.

r/CarTrackDays ·1 upvote ·2026-07-20

“Pretty terrible idea, the PS91 will not have the same heat capacity as the V730, so your front/rear grip balance will change wildly during a session. With the non-200s on the front, at least you’ll understeer instead of oversteer/spin, but not ideal. An experienced driver might be able to work around this, if you’re new, this would be a dangerous situation. Similarly, I wouldn’t mix something like a yokohama AO52, which delivers all of its grip from cold and tends to overheat within a couple laps, with something like a hankook RS4, which famously takes some time to warm up and then delivers consistent grip for a long time”

s197forum.com ·2017-03-29

“I've only got a couple thousand on them and just spirited driving in the mountains. I think they will easily go over 10k even with a few track events. I am thinking about getting a set for my SVT focus as I autoX with that car, much easier to drive at the limit than a turbocharged S197.”

rennlist.com

“my turbo came with a set of Kumho Ecsta PS91 in the OEM widebody sizes that were around a year old and had maybe lost 15% wear. coming from someone who loves PS4S, i hated them. grip was subpar. it felt wasteful to toss them though since they were relatively new and had decent tread left so i toughed them out. i got maybe 2k miles out of the rears before they needed replacement just from normal street / occasional spirited driving. they are not a great handling tire and they are quite bad from a wear perspective as well. just buy michelin or even continental and don't look back.”

Top themes
#budget performance value#rapid tread wear#wet and dry traction#track and heat limitations#ride quality and appearance#Michelin alternative comparison

Based on 45 community posts

Tire B

Nitto Invo

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS91 B · Nitto Invo
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available139
Rim diameters19″17″ – 22″
Tread depth9.5/32″10.3/32″
UTQG260 A A220 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Nitto Invo

Winner: Nitto Invo — better snow, treadwear and handling. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS91 if wet and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nitto Invo scores 52 vs 38 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nitto Invo scores 58 vs 49 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS91 scores 69 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nitto Invo scores 62 vs 57 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS91
Tire B · Nitto Invo

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

61

Narrow edge

Invo

Amazon