Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs Nitto Invo — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 485 + 38 owner reviews. How we score

Invo is ahead, 62–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS91
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS91

Summer

± 5

Tests 77 · 6 tests Owners 42 · 485 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 (exterior noise)

“Putting some Kumho Ecsta PS91s on. Curious how they’ll do since my go to Falken rt660 doesn’t come in the oem 18” sizes”

Nitto Invo
Tire BNitto

Invo

Summer

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 38 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests77≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5165

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 50.9 = 66

    Invo: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Ecsta PS91 +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests79≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5260

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 78.7 + 40% × 51.5 = 68

    Invo: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 63

    No road tests of wet for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 38

    Snow

    Invo +14
    52
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online1539

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 15 = 38

    Invo: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 52

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Invo +10
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4862

    Ecsta PS91: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 47.7 = 54

    Invo: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 61.9 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    Invo +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests70≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5077

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 49.6 = 62

    Invo: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 71

    No road tests of noise for Invo. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 44

    Treadwear

    Invo +13
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online3052

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 53.4 (est.) + 40% × 30.2 = 44

    Invo: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 53

    Handling (owners)

    Invo +10
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Reviews found online5363
  8. 47

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests47–
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs Nitto Invo: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS91Nitto Invo
Relative Score 57 62
Dry 66 66
Wet 68 63
Snow 38 52
Comfort 54 64
Noise 62 71
Treadwear 44 57
Handling (owners) 53 63
Efficiency 47 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Ecsta PS91

± 7

Invo

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS91

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip providing high confidence during spirited driving
  • Significantly more affordable than premium flagship alternatives while offering comparable performance
  • Stiff sidewalls enhance steering response, cornering stability, and feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly with aggressive driving or on heavier vehicles
  • Stiff sidewalls result in a firmer, less comfortable ride that transmits road imperfections
  • Tendency to tramline or follow road grooves on straight highways
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS91 review

Tire B Invo

Pros

  • Exceptional initial ride comfort and smoothness
  • Very quiet and low road noise when new
  • Strong dry traction and cornering grip for spirited driving

Cons

  • Dramatically reduced wet and dry grip as the tire wears down
  • Rapid tread wear and limited overall longevity
  • Develops severe road noise, whining, or harsh vibrations over time
All owner themes in the Invo review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Mixed

The community views the Kumho Ecsta PS91 as an attractive, budget-friendly max performance summer tire that offers decent street traction, low noise, and a tread pattern resembling higher-end options like Michelin. However, opinions are split; while some drivers praise them as a great value alternative for daily driving and light spirited use, enthusiasts note limitations regarding rapid wear, subpar track endurance, and inferior grip compared to top-tier performance tires.

Top themes
#Budget friendly pricing#Street performance and comfort#Tread wear and longevity#Track and grip limitations#Comparison to Michelin

Based on 46 community posts

Tire B

Nitto Invo

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS91 B · Nitto Invo
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available139
Rim diameters19″17″ – 22″
Tread depth9.5/32″10.3/32″
UTQG260 A A220 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Nitto Invo

Winner: Nitto Invo — better snow, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS91 if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nitto Invo scores 52 vs 38 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nitto Invo scores 57 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nitto Invo scores 64 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nitto Invo scores 63 vs 53 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS91
Tire B · Nitto Invo

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS91 or Invo?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS91 or Invo?

Kumho Ecsta PS91, 68 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS91 or Invo?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Ecsta PS91 or Invo?

Nitto Invo, 52 vs 38 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Ecsta PS91 or Invo?

Nitto Invo, 71 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS91 or Invo?

Nitto Invo, 64 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS91 or Invo?

Nitto Invo, 57 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology