Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs Bridgestone WeatherPeak — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 2 road tests and 2,588 + 383 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 83–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 82 · 2,588 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“CrossClimate 2 SUV not offered in 245/60R18, what would be the closest alternative? I'm trying to buy the best tires for a family SUV (Ford Edge) driving in south-east USA. Being able to drive in very wet conditions (hydroplaning resistance) safely and comfort/quiet are high priorities. Ice/general handling are also important to me but less high-prio since we don't get a lot of snow and it's a family SUV that is mostly not driven spirited. Treadwear/Cost is lowest priority, I just want the safest option, but ideally it wouldn't wear out too fast, at least 40-50k miles if that's reasonable. I can't find any CrossClimate 2 SUV sets in this size and those would be my first choice. Is it better to just get regular CrossClimate 2's in that size or should I get the SUV oriented Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive (this is what Tirerack is recommending me to get)? I've come to realize the CrossClimate 3's wont be here in time before the tires become too unsafe to drive on, which is extremely unfortunate timing.”

Bridgestone WeatherPeak

WeatherPeak

All Weather

± 6

Tests 54 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 383 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2024 TireRack All Season and Weather Tyre Test (snow handling)

“I put on Bridgestone Weather peak all weather tires on my 2017. Great tires, better grip in snow than all weather tires.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 87

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +43
    44
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVWeatherPeak
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 2 tests8629
    Reviews found online8867

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 88.1 = 87

    WeatherPeak: 60% × 29.2 + 40% × 67.1 = 44

  2. 84

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +20
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVWeatherPeak
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 2 tests8457
    Reviews found online8576

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.9 + 40% × 84.7 = 84

    WeatherPeak: 60% × 56.7 + 40% × 75.5 = 64

  3. 90

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +4
    86
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVWeatherPeak
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 2 tests9791
    Reviews found online8079

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.4 + 40% × 79.9 = 90

    WeatherPeak: 60% × 90.8 + 40% × 79.2 = 86

  4. 85

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +15
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVWeatherPeak
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests81≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8871

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 81.3 + 60% × 87.6 = 85

    WeatherPeak: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 70.8 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for WeatherPeak. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 76

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVWeatherPeak
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests82≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)74

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76

    WeatherPeak: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for WeatherPeak. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +9
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVWeatherPeak
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7358

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70

    WeatherPeak: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for WeatherPeak. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 89

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +26
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVWeatherPeak
    Reviews found online8963
  8. 87

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVWeatherPeak
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests87–
Scores at a glance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs Bridgestone WeatherPeak: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate 2 SUVBridgestone WeatherPeak
Relative Score 83 62
Dry 87 44
Wet 84 64
Snow 90 86
Comfort 85 70
Noise 76 69
Treadwear 70 61
Handling (owners) 89 63
Efficiency 87 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

± 6

WeatherPeak

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossClimate 2 SUVWeatherPeakΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 86% #5/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 98% #5/5 · 2025 Car and Driver All Weather Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 99% #3/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 84% #5/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 97% #6/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 91% #5/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 97% #4/5 · 2025 Car and Driver All Weather Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 72% #4/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Circle Snow 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 97% #3/5 · 2025 Car and Driver All Weather Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 100% #1/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 92% #5/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 100% #1/5 · 2025 Car and Driver All Weather Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 88% #5/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 #4/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

Tire B WeatherPeak

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality on the highway
  • Reliable handling and braking performance on wet roads

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear and lower longevity than advertised
  • Handling issues, tracking problems, or shimmying on grooved highways
  • Slight decrease in fuel economy (MPG) reported by some drivers
All owner themes in the WeatherPeak review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community members generally view the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV as a premium, dependable tire known for strong snow and dry performance, comfortable driving feel, and valuable 3PMS certification. Discussions frequently center around sizing availability, comparison to other models like the Primacy or standard CrossClimate 2, and choosing between specific speed or OEM ratings.

r/CarTalkUK ·1 upvote ·2023-10-09

“Michelin Cross Climate 2 vs 2 SUV Hi I am looking at new tyres and am pretty convinced to go for the Michelin Cross Climates, but I am confused by the Cross Climate 2 vs the Cross Climate 2 SUV; they seem the same tyre, albeit the non-SUV version has better fuel economy, according to the EU Label system. I asked Michelin, but their response was meaningless: they just listed the same bullet points for each. Can anyone advise the difference, and do I need the SUV version? One car for these is a 2023 Skoda Kodiaq 2.0L TSI190 4x4 (well, the Volkswagen version of 4x4), tyre size 235/50/19. The other car is a 2019 Kia Sportage, which needs 225/60/17; in this car's case, it is just the non-SUV version available despite both cars being SUVs and of similar weights, albeit this car is a 1.6L 130hp. As a family, we have used winter tyres in the past, but since changing cars this year, we are thinking of switching to all seasons as we think they will suit us perfectly rather than switching tyres every April and November. Live in Lincolnshire. So we get all weathers ranging from -10 through to +35. Thanks for any and all advice. Paul Read more”

mbworld.org

“So here's the latest on Tires recommendations: (still dithering). Looking for smooth, soft ride, good mileage. I do have a mountain home; use ~30ish days during winter ski season, but mostly highway driving in Southern California ( don't disparage me for being a Californian. I cant stand the people or the government too lol. But it's a beautiful state). 2020 300GLC 4MATIC California car, 235/60 18H rating What will it be...?????? MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S - seems like you guys are in favor. But hard to get. And the size is a 235/60 106T designation. Is the T speed max of 116mph not safe enough when OEM was an H rating 130mph? MICHELIN DEFENDER2. $238. Tire rack MICHELIN CrossClimate2 SUV tire rack $248. - hearing both good and bad. I heard they're soft and mileage tanks. Check out reviews on the Michelin USA official site. Pretty interesting. CONTINENTAL CROSSCONTACT LX25 $222. tire rack high rating? Also just got this from TireRack customer service CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS. $238. Not sure, seems like TR is trying to promote them for Cont.”

chrforums.uk ·2 upvotes ·2024-06-04

“I have the Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV tyres . The many reviews I read approved of their performance in snowy conditions (if that is an issue where you live) and also their dry condition performance. They supposedly have a decent life span. They felt nicer to drive on than the Primacy tyres . They weren't cheap at about £170 each fitted but will give me some insurance about snowy conditions and will hopefully last until I swap the car in about 3 years.”

Top themes
#snow and dry performance#speed and OEM ratings#tire size availability#comfort and driving feel#comparison with Primacy#SUV versus standard version

Based on 8 community posts

Tire B

Bridgestone WeatherPeak

Mixed

Community opinion on the Bridgestone WeatherPeak is largely divided. Drivers praise the tire for its wet traction, snow performance, comfortable ride, and low initial road noise compared to stock tires. However, many users report significant concerns regarding premature tread wear, dry rotting or cracking, noise increases over time, and notable drops in fuel/EV efficiency.

r/Honda ·2 upvotes ·2026-05-29

“Bridgestone WeatherPeak I bought the BridgeStone WeatherPeak in November. 3 days ago, my tire had 2 cuts like this. When I took it to the dealership they said it was due to some road hazard. Something on the road had cut the tires. They replaced it, and 2 days later another tire ripped, this time it was 1 cut instead of 2 like this. I went back to the dealership and they said the same thing again that, it was due to something on the road or someone slashed it. What is the real issue? I don't know enough about tires to answer this. Read more”

mazdas247.com ·1 upvote ·2022-12-11

“Hey everyone, I’ve owned these tires from almost 5k miles. Had bought these at Costco. Honestly love them. My only complaint is I think I have tire rub. I feel the vibration and noise when there is 2 or more adults in the car. My tire is 225/65/17”

r/tires ·9 upvotes ·2025-04-17

“Bridgestone Weatherpeak Long-term review I've had these tires for a year now, and they've truly disappointed me. I live in the Philadelphia area, so I decided on "3peak mountain" tires. Sometimes we can have a completely dry winter, and sometimes we can have a very snowy one. As for fuel efficiency, it has a positive point. I imagine that because it is high in silica (the main component of winter tires and efficient tires), it helps a lot and I think they have a rolling resistance similar to the Michelin Primacy (I think that in snow they soften a lot and are not efficient, but that's okay). So, as tire performance in winter conditions, they're really very good. No complaints! The problem comes in the summer or on wet, cool days. Accelerating and braking is a nightmare. They have poor traction on dry roads in the summer and very poor traction on wet roads. Plus, they've worn much faster than expected. Only 25,000 miles and they're already at 5/32 (they comes with 70k miles warranty but you cannot do a claim before 2/32). In short, I'd say this is a winter tire promoted by Bridgestone as "all-season." But I think isn't! Next tires? Probably Michelin or Vredestein Edit; I successfully filed a claim (THANKS COSTCO) but also as September of 2025, Costco decided to stop selling this garbage tires Read more”

Top themes
#Wet and rain traction#Snow and winter grip#Premature tread wear#Road noise and comfort#EV efficiency drop#Costco pricing and rebates#Comparison to CrossClimate 2

Based on 82 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV B · Bridgestone WeatherPeak
CategoryAll SeasonAll Weather
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3562
Rim diameters17″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—700 A A - B
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering
Max pressure—44 - 51 psi
Sizes in common99

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Bridgestone WeatherPeak

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 44 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 84 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 85 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire B · Bridgestone WeatherPeak

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossClimate 2 SUV or WeatherPeak?

Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate 2 SUV or WeatherPeak?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate 2 SUV or WeatherPeak?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossClimate 2 SUV or WeatherPeak?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 90 vs 86 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossClimate 2 SUV or WeatherPeak?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 76 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate 2 SUV or WeatherPeak?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 85 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossClimate 2 SUV or WeatherPeak?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology