Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Too close to call: Energy Saver A/S and Pilot HX MXM4 are level at 55.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    Pilot HX MXM4 +1
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPilot HX MXM4
    Reviews found online4951
  2. 54

    Wet

    Pilot HX MXM4 +1
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPilot HX MXM4
    Reviews found online4850
  3. 54

    Snow

    Level
    54
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPilot HX MXM4
    Reviews found online4443
  4. 60

    Comfort

    Pilot HX MXM4 +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPilot HX MXM4
    Reviews found online5154
  5. 61

    Noise

    Energy Saver A/S +1
    60
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPilot HX MXM4
    Reviews found online5250
  6. 57

    Treadwear

    Energy Saver A/S +5
    52
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPilot HX MXM4
    Reviews found online5143
  7. 50

    Handling

    Energy Saver A/S +2
    48
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPilot HX MXM4
    Reviews found online5048
Scores at a glance
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Michelin Pilot HX MXM4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Energy Saver A/SMichelin Pilot HX MXM4
Relative Score 55 55
Dry 56 57
Wet 54 55
Snow 54 54
Comfort 60 62
Noise 61 60
Treadwear 57 52
Handling 50 48

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Energy Saver A/S

Pilot HX MXM4

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Energy Saver A/S

Pros

  • High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
  • Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
  • Reliable dry weather traction for some users

Cons

  • Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
  • Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
All owner themes in the Energy Saver A/S review

Tire B Pilot HX MXM4

Pros

  • Acceptable tread life for some users under specific driving conditions
  • Generally comfortable ride quality when new
  • Reliable performance for moderate, dry-weather driving

Cons

  • Poor traction and safety concerns on wet surfaces
  • Inadequate performance in winter conditions despite M+S rating
  • Reports of sidewall tearing and tread delamination
All owner themes in the Pilot HX MXM4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S B · Michelin Pilot HX MXM4
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Energy Saver A/S

Michelin Pilot HX MXM4

Too close to call: Michelin Energy Saver A/S and Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Energy Saver A/S is stronger on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 57 vs 52 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Tire B · Michelin Pilot HX MXM4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

55

Too close to call

Energy Saver A/S

Amazon