tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 10 + 16 road tests and 12 + 1,583 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac is ahead, 80–75

Check price on Amazon · Quatrac or N Blue 4Season 2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
Tire ANexen

N Blue 4Season 2

All Season

± 5

Tests 75 · 10 tests Owners 75 · 12 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (noise)

Vredestein Quatrac
Tire BVredestein

Quatrac

All Season

± 4

Tests 82 · 16 tests Owners 79 · 1,583 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)

“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Temp 55° F Avg speed 65-80mph 2019 M3 RWD LR Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 6 tests that measured dry braking for both, N Blue 4Season 2 won 5 and Quatrac won 1 (average 95% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 6 tests that measured wet braking for both, N Blue 4Season 2 won 0 and Quatrac won 6 (average 89% vs 97% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured curved aquaplaning for both, N Blue 4Season 2 won 0 and Quatrac won 3 (average 81% vs 90% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, N Blue 4Season 2 won 0 and Quatrac won 3 (average 90% vs 97% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured snow braking for both, N Blue 4Season 2 won 1 and Quatrac won 2 (average 93% vs 96% of the best).
  1. 79

    Dry

    Quatrac +2
    81
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue 4Season 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 16 tests8484
    Reviews found online7378
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 5–195%93%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–298%99%

    N Blue 4Season 2: 60% × 83.8 + 40% × 72.8 = 79

    Quatrac: 60% × 83.6 + 40% × 78.3 = 81

  2. 74

    Wet

    Quatrac +18
    92
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue 4Season 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 16 tests7296
    Reviews found online7886
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–381%90%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–390%97%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 0–689%97%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–095%94%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%100%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–294%100%

    N Blue 4Season 2: 60% × 71.9 + 40% × 77.9 = 74

    Quatrac: 60% × 95.7 + 40% × 86.1 = 92

  3. 71

    Snow

    Quatrac +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue 4Season 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 11 tests7275
    Reviews found online7074
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%91%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–293%96%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–296%99%
    Snow Slalom (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%93%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–393%95%

    N Blue 4Season 2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 69.8 = 71

    Quatrac: 60% × 75 + 40% × 74.1 = 75

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Quatrac +8
    74
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue 4Season 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests5173
    Reviews found online7675
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–091%91%

    N Blue 4Season 2: 40% × 51.2 + 60% × 75.8 = 66

    Quatrac: 40% × 73 + 60% × 74.9 = 74

  5. 78

    Noise

    N Blue 4Season 2 +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue 4Season 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 11 tests8580
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–1100%99%

    N Blue 4Season 2: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 78

    Quatrac: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for N Blue 4Season 2 or Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    N Blue 4Season 2 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue 4Season 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 7 tests7473
    Reviews found online7878
    Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–167%80%
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–190%76%

    N Blue 4Season 2: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 78.3 = 76

    Quatrac: 60% × 73 + 40% × 77.8 = 75

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac +2
    77
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue 4Season 2Quatrac
    Reviews found online7577
  8. 70

    Efficiency

    Quatrac +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue 4Season 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 11 tests7073
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–095%95%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–191%91%
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N Blue 4Season 2Vredestein Quatrac
Relative Score 75 80
Dry 79 81
Wet 74 92
Snow 71 75
Comfort 66 74
Noise 78 75
Treadwear 76 75
Handling (owners) 75 77
Efficiency 70 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

N Blue 4Season 2

± 4

Quatrac

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 6 tests that ran both, Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 finished ahead 0 times and Vredestein Quatrac 6 times.

DisciplineCategoryN Blue 4Season 2QuatracΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% 93% +1.9 5–1 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Dry Handling Dry 98% 99% −0.8 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 81% 90% −9.7 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 90% 97% −6.8 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Wet Braking Wet 89% 97% −8.1 0–6 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 95% 94% +0.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Wet Circle Wet 99% 100% −1.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Handling Wet 94% 100% −5.8 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Ice Braking Snow 99% 91% +8.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Snow Braking Snow 93% 96% −3.3 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Snow Handling Snow 96% 99% −2.6 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Snow Slalom Snow 99% 93% +5.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Snow Traction Snow 93% 95% −2.7 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 91% 91% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Noise Noise 100% 99% +0.9 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Abrasion Treadwear 67% 80% −13.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Wear Treadwear 90% 76% +14.3 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 95% 95% +0.8 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 91% 91% +0.4 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #1/16 #13/16 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Value Cost 100% 47% +52.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #9/16 #4/16 – 0–6 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Blue 4Season 2

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong value for money compared to premium alternatives
  • Reliable capability and grip in winter conditions, including snow and ice

Cons

  • Can feel somewhat squishy or lack precision during spirited driving
  • Not ideally suited for extreme handling or pushing the car to its absolute limits
  • Some limitations in tricky ice conditions compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the N Blue 4Season 2 review

Tire B Quatrac

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces

Cons

  • Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
  • Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
All owner themes in the Quatrac review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac

Positive

Community members widely view the Vredestein Quatrac lineup as a high-value, comfortable, and quiet alternative to more expensive premium tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Drivers frequently praise its smooth ride quality and dependable wet and light-to-moderate snow traction, though several note it does not match dedicated snow tires in severe winter conditions. Concerns occasionally arise regarding faster tread wear, shoulder chunking, and rolling resistance.

alltrac.net ·2025-04-09

“I agree with all of that. The Vredesteins are good, at least the set I have was. I’ll give them another shot at $600. If the sidewalls are a bit fragile to get that lightness, I suppose that’s something to keep in mind. Most people just don’t think about their car and don’t want to. They just want to go to work and get home after work. People have weird expectations of their tires. Whether this is a joke or not it might as well be a genuine review because certainly there’s someone out there for whom this is true.”
r/TeslaModel3 ·2026-06-02

“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Temp 55° F Avg speed 65-80mph 2019 M3 RWD LR Read more”
r/TeslaModelY ·5 upvotes ·2026-10-05

“23 Model Y LR....just did my first tire change at 41k miles from stock Contis to Vredestein Quatrac Pro+. Better all the way around, no foam. There is not much of a road noise difference, maybe a bit louder going over concrete sections on some highways. I don't buy into the foam theory. Noise comes from tire composition and tread hitting varying surfaces. Every tire will give a different sound and sound level, foam or not.”
Top themes
#Ride comfort and low noise#Wet and rain traction#Snow and winter capability#Affordable premium alternative#Tread wear and longevity#Shoulder wear and chunking#Rolling resistance and EV range

Based on 64 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 B · Vredestein Quatrac
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available11839
Rim diameters14″ – 21″15″ – 18″
Sizes in common2626

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2

Vredestein Quatrac

Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better wet, comfort and snow. Pick the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac scores 92 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Vredestein Quatrac scores 75 vs 71 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 scores 78 vs 75 on noise.

Tire A · Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Blue 4Season 2 or Quatrac?

Which is better in the wet, N Blue 4Season 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 92 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Blue 4Season 2 or Quatrac?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 81 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, N Blue 4Season 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 71 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, N Blue 4Season 2 or Quatrac?

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2, 78 vs 75 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, N Blue 4Season 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N Blue 4Season 2 or Quatrac?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, N Blue 4Season 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 73 vs 70 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology