Tests – · none yet Owners 81 · 80 reviews
Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Nexen N Fera Primus — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 7 road tests and 80 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU4 is ahead, 78–72
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 7 tests Owners 79 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
N Fera SU4 +475Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 85 78 N Fera SU4: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 85.1 = 79
N Fera Primus: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 77.9 = 75
No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
81
Wet
N Fera Primus +485Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 79 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 85 84 N Fera SU4: 60% × 78.7 (est.) + 40% × 85.2 = 81
N Fera Primus: 60% × 86.3 + 40% × 83.5 = 85
No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +2057Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 32 Reviews found online 80 74 N Fera SU4: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77
N Fera Primus: 40% × 32.2 + 60% × 73.9 = 57
No road tests of comfort for N Fera SU4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 64 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) N Fera Primus: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 65
No owner ratings of noise for N Fera Primus. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
71
Treadwear
N Fera SU4 +2150Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 33 Reviews found online 74 77 N Fera SU4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 71
N Fera Primus: 60% × 32.9 + 40% × 76.7 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
80
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU4 +575Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Fera Primus Reviews found online 80 75 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison54Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU4 | Nexen N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 72 |
| Dry | 79 | 75 |
| Wet | 81 | 85 |
| Comfort | 77 | 57 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 75 |
| Efficiency | – | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
N Fera SU4
N Fera Primus
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Tire B N Fera Primus
Pros
- Fantastic dry and wet grip with stable cornering and predictable handling
- High level of comfort with a smooth, soft ride that absorbs bumps well
- Noticeably quieter than certain premium alternatives
Cons
- Slightly longer braking distances compared to some competing brands like Falken
- Reports of faster tread wear and relatively low initial tread depth
- Can be noisy for some drivers depending on the vehicle and road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU4 | B · Nexen N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 50 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N Fera SU4
Nexen N Fera Primus
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. Pick the Nexen N Fera Primus if wet matters most to you.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 71 vs 50 on treadwear.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 77 vs 57 on comfort.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 79 vs 75 on dry.
Nexen N Fera Primus scores 85 vs 81 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera SU4 or N Fera Primus?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU4 or N Fera Primus?
Nexen N Fera Primus, 85 vs 81 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU4 or N Fera Primus?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 79 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU4 or N Fera Primus?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 77 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera SU4 or N Fera Primus?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 71 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology