tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 237 owner reviews. How we score

Ultrac Sessanta leads, 80–78 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Ultrac Sessanta or N Fera SU4 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Fera SU4
Tire ANexen

N Fera SU4

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 81 · 80 reviews

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Tire BVredestein

Ultrac Sessanta

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 237 reviews

“I ran Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta on my IS350 15 years ago and absolutely loved them! Unless their quality has gone down since then I I wouldn’t hesitate to run them again.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 79

    Dry

    Ultrac Sessanta +1
    80
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU4Ultrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online8587

    N Fera SU4: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 85.1 = 79

    Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 86.7 = 80

    No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 81

    Wet

    Ultrac Sessanta +2
    83
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU4Ultrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 79 (est.)≈ 80 (est.)
    Reviews found online8587

    N Fera SU4: 60% × 78.7 (est.) + 40% × 85.2 = 81

    Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 79.9 (est.) + 40% × 87.2 = 83

    No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 77

    Comfort

    Level
    77
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU4Ultrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8081

    N Fera SU4: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    Ultrac Sessanta: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 80.9 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for N Fera SU4 or Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 71

    Treadwear

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU4Ultrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7473

    N Fera SU4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 71

    Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 80

    Handling (owners)

    Ultrac Sessanta +5
    85
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU4Ultrac Sessanta
    Reviews found online8085
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N Fera SU4Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Relative Score 78 80
Dry 79 80
Wet 81 83
Comfort 77 77
Treadwear 71 71
Handling (owners) 80 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N Fera SU4

± 8

Ultrac Sessanta

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Fera SU4

Pros

  • Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
  • High level of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
  • Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
  • Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
All owner themes in the N Fera SU4 review

Tire B Ultrac Sessanta

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many users reporting rapid wear
  • Increased road noise, often described as a drone or bearing-like sound
  • Poor performance in snow and icy conditions
All owner themes in the Ultrac Sessanta review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nexen N Fera SU4

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

Positive

Community opinion on the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high value, impressive wet and dry grip, and smooth, quiet ride compared to stiff run-flat tires. While a few noted soft sidewalls or increased noise late in the tread life, the tire developed a strong reputation for offering high-end performance at an affordable price point.

corvetteforum.com

“I have them also. I love them. I haven't raced with them and my car is a daily driver. But I take some nice mountain twisty roads on the way to work along with highway roads and it preforms great anywhere. Also not so bad in the rain. Overall I love these tires for the price. I would recommend them to anyone. I'm hopping to get some fresh pics soon. Mine are 18/19. Here are some old photos on my old rims. I have the same tires on my new rims (18/19 C6Z deep dish, black with polished lip).”
team-bhp.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by anandpadhye Local manufacturing is the news but isn't the brand already available in India? Very right, Anand. They were available in select sizes (mostly the Sportrac range) throughout, but looks like Apollo has now brought in the 16 - 20" moulds to make them here. They have some exquisite tread patterns, especially the Ultrac Sessanta. But better to see their reliability under Indian conditions and then buy a set.”
5series.net

“Yesterday was the first time I'd driven the car more than 2 miles since making the switch from the RFT RE050A's to the ultrac sessanta's. Covered 50 miles on A roads and Motorways. Overall impressions were good, the car was less harsh over broken surfaces. I had no feeling of road camber effecting the steering. I noticed on jacking the car that the sidewalls are pretty soft, I added a few PSI over the stock settings. You still feel all the bumps as is to be expected on 40 profile tyres, just less intrusive. I still have to drive on B roads but so far so good. Jason”
Top themes
#Ride Comfort and Noise#Price and Value#Dry and Wet Grip#Unique Tread Pattern#Transition from Run-Flats

Based on 55 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Fera SU4 B · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Fera SU4

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

Narrow edge: Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU4
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Fera SU4 or Ultrac Sessanta?

Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU4 or Ultrac Sessanta?

Neither, by our numbers: 81 vs 83 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU4 or Ultrac Sessanta?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 80 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU4 or Ultrac Sessanta?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 77 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, N Fera SU4 or Ultrac Sessanta?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology