Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 14 reviews
Nexen N Priz RH7 vs Yokohama BluEarth S34 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
N Priz RH7 is ahead, 48–41
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 29 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
N Priz RH7 +842Why this score
Source N Priz RH7 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 41 29 N Priz RH7: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 40.5 = 50
BluEarth S34: 60% × 51.7 (est.) + 40% × 28.5 = 42
No road tests of dry for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
51
Wet
N Priz RH7 +1140Why this score
Source N Priz RH7 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 47 (est.) Reviews found online 44 28 N Priz RH7: 60% × 56.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 51
BluEarth S34: 60% × 47.3 (est.) + 40% × 27.9 = 40
No road tests of wet for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
45
Snow
BluEarth S34 +247Why this score
Source N Priz RH7 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 28 30 N Priz RH7: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 27.7 = 45
BluEarth S34: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 30.3 = 47
No road tests of snow for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
51
Comfort
N Priz RH7 +1536Why this score
Source N Priz RH7 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 42 20 N Priz RH7: 40% × 63.4 (est.) + 60% × 42.4 = 51
BluEarth S34: 40% × 59.1 (est.) + 60% × 20.4 = 36
No road tests of comfort for N Priz RH7 or BluEarth S34. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
59
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source N Priz RH7 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 49 – N Priz RH7: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.7 = 59
No road tests of noise for N Priz RH7. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
46
Treadwear
Level46Why this score
Source N Priz RH7 BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 34 34 N Priz RH7: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 46
BluEarth S34: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 33.6 = 46
No road tests of treadwear for N Priz RH7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
39
Handling (owners)
N Priz RH7 +1524Why this score
Source N Priz RH7 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 39 24
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Priz RH7 | Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 41 |
| Dry | 50 | 42 |
| Wet | 51 | 40 |
| Snow | 45 | 47 |
| Comfort | 51 | 36 |
| Noise | 59 | – |
| Treadwear | 46 | 46 |
| Handling (owners) | 39 | 24 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
N Priz RH7
BluEarth S34
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Priz RH7
Pros
- Affordable value-priced option compared to premium brands
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Positive wet traction and handling reported by some users
Cons
- Significant loss of grip and slippery behavior in wet conditions, leading to spin-outs or hydroplaning concerns
- Poor performance in light snow and ice, particularly for rear-wheel-drive or 2WD vehicles
- Some reports of premature structural degradation, such as the tire tearing apart after a few years
Tire B BluEarth S34
Pros
- Dry grip is described as adequate by most reviewers and as 'phenomenal' by one.
- Low rolling resistance contributes to fuel savings on hybrids.
- One reviewer found handling great and the tire very good value for the price.
Cons
- Wet traction is the most frequent complaint: reports of slipping in the rain, sliding when turning in wet conditions despite traction and stability control, and initial slipperiness on new tires.
- Handling is described as poor or only 'so-so' by several reviewers.
- Noise is prominent, including wind and road noise at speed (one reviewer measured roughly 85 dB at 70 mph).
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Priz RH7 | B · Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 12 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 540 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N Priz RH7
Yokohama BluEarth S34
Winner: Nexen N Priz RH7 — better comfort, handling and wet. Where the Yokohama BluEarth S34 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Nexen N Priz RH7 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama BluEarth S34 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N Priz RH7 scores 51 vs 36 on comfort.
Nexen N Priz RH7 scores 39 vs 24 on handling.
Nexen N Priz RH7 scores 51 vs 40 on wet.
Nexen N Priz RH7 scores 50 vs 42 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Priz RH7 or BluEarth S34?
Which is better in the wet, N Priz RH7 or BluEarth S34?
Nexen N Priz RH7, 51 vs 40 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Priz RH7 or BluEarth S34?
Nexen N Priz RH7, 50 vs 42 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, N Priz RH7 or BluEarth S34?
Neither, by our numbers: 45 vs 47 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, N Priz RH7 or BluEarth S34?
Nexen N Priz RH7, 51 vs 36 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Priz RH7 or BluEarth S34?
Neither, by our numbers: 46 vs 46 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology