Tests – · 1 test Owners 66 · 116 reviews
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 3 road tests and 116 + 13 owner reviews. How we score
Kinergy 4S leads, 67–64 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 13 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Level69Why this score
Source HTR A/S P02 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 70 69 HTR A/S P02: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69
Kinergy 4S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of dry for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
Kinergy 4S +473Why this score
Source HTR A/S P02 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 68 71 HTR A/S P02: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 69
Kinergy 4S: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 71.1 = 73
No road tests of wet for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
62
Snow
Kinergy 4S +870Why this score
Source HTR A/S P02 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 57 76 HTR A/S P02: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 62
Kinergy 4S: 60% × 66.2 + 40% × 76 = 70
No road tests of snow for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
63
Comfort
Kinergy 4S +467Why this score
Source HTR A/S P02 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 61 67 HTR A/S P02: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 60.6 = 63
Kinergy 4S: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of comfort for HTR A/S P02 or Kinergy 4S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
HTR A/S P02 +860Why this score
Source HTR A/S P02 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 56 Reviews found online 70 ≈ 67 (est.) HTR A/S P02: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68
Kinergy 4S: 60% × 56.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 60
No road tests of noise for HTR A/S P02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
53
Treadwear
Kinergy 4S +962Why this score
Source HTR A/S P02 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 45 62 Reviews found online 64 62 HTR A/S P02: 60% × 44.8 + 40% × 64.4 = 53
Kinergy 4S: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 62 = 62
-
65
Handling (owners)
HTR A/S P02 +164Why this score
Source HTR A/S P02 Kinergy 4S Reviews found online 65 64 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison67Why this score
Source HTR A/S P02 Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 | Hankook Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 67 |
| Dry | 69 | 69 |
| Wet | 69 | 73 |
| Snow | 62 | 70 |
| Comfort | 63 | 67 |
| Noise | 68 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 64 |
| Efficiency | – | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
HTR A/S P02
Kinergy 4S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | HTR A/S P02 | Kinergy 4S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #18/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | #12/30 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A HTR A/S P02
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Low road noise and comfortable, smooth ride
- Responsive dry and wet handling
Cons
- Tread life occasionally falls short of expected mileage warranties
- Winter and snow traction is generally described as merely adequate or mediocre
- Some complaints regarding balancing issues or slight hydroplaning in heavy downpours
Tire B Kinergy 4S
Pros
- Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
- Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
- Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
- Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 | B · Hankook Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 67 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02
Hankook Kinergy 4S
Narrow edge: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better treadwear, snow and wet. Pick the Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 if noise matters most to you.
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 62 vs 53 on treadwear.
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 scores 68 vs 60 on noise.
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 70 vs 62 on snow.
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 73 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
HTR A/S P02 or Kinergy 4S?
Which is better in the wet, HTR A/S P02 or Kinergy 4S?
Hankook Kinergy 4S, 73 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, HTR A/S P02 or Kinergy 4S?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, HTR A/S P02 or Kinergy 4S?
Hankook Kinergy 4S, 70 vs 62 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, HTR A/S P02 or Kinergy 4S?
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02, 68 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, HTR A/S P02 or Kinergy 4S?
Hankook Kinergy 4S, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, HTR A/S P02 or Kinergy 4S?
Hankook Kinergy 4S, 62 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology