Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 71 · 50 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 10 in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Head-to-head
Updated
Toyo Proxes T1 Sport vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 50 + 497 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Proxes T1 Sport and ADVAN Sport V105 are level at 70.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 67 · 497 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Tread Life on the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
ADVAN Sport V105 +473Why this score
Source Proxes T1 Sport ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 63 73 Reviews found online 79 74 Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 91% 92% Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 96% 98% Proxes T1 Sport: 60% × 62.8 + 40% × 78.7 = 69
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 73.5 = 73
-
73
Wet
Proxes T1 Sport +172Why this score
Source Proxes T1 Sport ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 71 72 Reviews found online 75 72 Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 94% 94% Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 89% 88% Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 96% 99% Proxes T1 Sport: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 75.3 = 73
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72 + 40% × 72.4 = 72
-
–
Snow
No comparison60Why this score
Source Proxes T1 Sport ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online – 54 ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
70
Comfort
Proxes T1 Sport +367Why this score
Source Proxes T1 Sport ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 70 66 Proxes T1 Sport: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 69.8 = 70
ADVAN Sport V105: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Proxes T1 Sport or ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
Proxes T1 Sport +1059Why this score
Source Proxes T1 Sport ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 71 53 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) 67 Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 99% 97% Proxes T1 Sport: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 53.1 + 40% × 67.3 = 59
No owner ratings of noise for Proxes T1 Sport. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
ADVAN Sport V105 +566Why this score
Source Proxes T1 Sport ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 58 61 Proxes T1 Sport: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 61
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.8 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes T1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
77
Handling (owners)
Proxes T1 Sport +572Why this score
Source Proxes T1 Sport ADVAN Sport V105 Reviews found online 77 72 -
71
Efficiency
Proxes T1 Sport +1259Why this score
Source Proxes T1 Sport ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 71 59 Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 94% 85%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes T1 Sport | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 70 |
| Dry | 69 | 73 |
| Wet | 73 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 70 | 67 |
| Noise | 69 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 71 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Proxes T1 Sport
70
/ 100
ADVAN Sport V105
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 6 tests that ran both, Toyo Proxes T1 Sport finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 5 times.
| Discipline | Category | Proxes T1 Sport | ADVAN Sport V105 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% | 92% | −0.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 96% | 98% | −2.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% | 94% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 89% | 88% | +1.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% | 99% | −2.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 97% | +1.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% | 85% | +9.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 71% | 57% | +13.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/10 | #8/10 | – | 1–5 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes T1 Sport
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for confident cornering and braking
- High level of ride comfort and shock absorption, outperforming stiff run-flats
- Lower price point compared to top-tier premium competitors while maintaining comparable performance
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan, with many users reporting the need for replacements well under 15,000 miles
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a less direct or squirmy feel during aggressive cornering
- Occasional sensitivity to road grooves, uneven surfaces, and standing water (hydroplaning tendencies)
Tire B ADVAN Sport V105
Pros
- Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet road conditions
- Sharp, responsive steering feel and high cornering stability
- Competitive pricing offering great value relative to flagship alternatives
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly under spirited or track driving
- Noticeable road noise on certain vehicles or rough road surfaces
- Subpar performance and lack of confidence in snow and freezing temperatures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Toyo Proxes T1 Sport
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Community discussions reflect mixed impressions regarding the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, highlighting both praise for its wet and dry handling along with debates surrounding its tread life. While some drivers report surprisingly durable treadwear and good overall value, others cite reports of poor tread life and note that ride comfort and road noise may trail competitor offerings.
northamericanmotoring.com
“Advan Sport V105 does get a good tirerack review: Comes in 205/55-16 (three models. Mercedes W and V speed rated and 2010 Production) $83-86 each Not as comfortable or quiet as other Max Summer tires but handles well in both dry and wet. If you prefer to keep the 205/50-16 tire size then for street use and daily driving with a slightly higher budget: Michelin Premier A/S Grand Touring All Season $132 each 640 treadwear, V speed rated, 19 lbs. Tirerack test result- Good blend of comfort and handling with much longer treadlife.”
r/WRX
·1 upvote ·2020-03-08
“I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”
Top themes
#tread life longevity#dry and wet handling#comparison to Michelin PS4S#ride comfort and noise#OEM fitment evaluation#daily driving performance
Based on 7 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes T1 Sport | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 144 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | 16″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Toyo Proxes T1 Sport
70
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Too close to call: Toyo Proxes T1 Sport and Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 are within 2 points overall. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport is stronger on efficiency, noise and comfort. Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 is stronger on treadwear and dry.
Pick tire A
You want lower fuel or energy use
Toyo Proxes T1 Sport scores 71 vs 59 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Toyo Proxes T1 Sport scores 69 vs 59 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.
Tire A · Toyo Proxes T1 Sport
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes T1 Sport or ADVAN Sport V105?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes T1 Sport or ADVAN Sport V105?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes T1 Sport or ADVAN Sport V105?
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Proxes T1 Sport or ADVAN Sport V105?
Toyo Proxes T1 Sport, 69 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes T1 Sport or ADVAN Sport V105?
Toyo Proxes T1 Sport, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Proxes T1 Sport or ADVAN Sport V105?
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 66 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Proxes T1 Sport or ADVAN Sport V105?
Toyo Proxes T1 Sport, 71 vs 59 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology