Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Quatrac 2 vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 7 + 213 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN A052 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Quatrac 2

Quatrac 2

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 7 reviews

Yokohama ADVAN A052
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN A052

Summer

± 5

Tests 76 · 4 tests Owners 69 · 213 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    ADVAN A052 +11
    80
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 68 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6990

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 90.4 = 80

    No road tests of dry for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    ADVAN A052 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 72 (est.)78
    Reviews found online7367

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 78 + 40% × 67.4 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    ADVAN A052 +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6475

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 73

    No road tests of snow for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Quatrac 2 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)75
    Reviews found online7063

    Quatrac 2: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70

    ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.5 + 60% × 63.4 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Quatrac 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–77
    Reviews found online–77

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 77 + 40% × 76.9 = 77

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Quatrac 2 +19
    50
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online7139

    Quatrac 2: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 69

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN A052 +24
    85
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 2ADVAN A052
    Reviews found online6185
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Quatrac 2 vs Yokohama ADVAN A052: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Quatrac 2Yokohama ADVAN A052
Relative Score 69 72
Dry 69 80
Wet 72 74
Snow 66 73
Comfort 70 68
Noise – 77
Treadwear 69 50
Handling (owners) 61 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Quatrac 2

± 5

ADVAN A052

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Quatrac 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
  • Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Higher road noise levels compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight decrease in fuel economy
  • Perceived lack of sidewall rigidity and road feedback
All owner themes in the Quatrac 2 review

Tire B ADVAN A052

Pros

  • Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
  • Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
  • Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
  • Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
  • Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
All owner themes in the ADVAN A052 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Vredestein Quatrac 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Positive

Community members widely view the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-grip competition tire suited for autocross and track driving. While praised for its light weight and superior all-out performance compared to standard street and summer tires, users frequently discuss its high cost, soft compound, potential lack of tread longevity on long road trips, and tendency to fling rocks.

Top themes
#competition and autocross performance#tire weight comparison#track day durability#soft compound longevity#200 treadwear grip#fitment and sizing

Based on 11 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Quatrac 2 B · Yokohama ADVAN A052
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—61
Rim diameters—13″ – 20″
Tread depth—7/32″
UTQG—200 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Quatrac 2

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better handling, dry and snow. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac 2 if treadwear matters most to you. Vredestein Quatrac 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 85 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 69 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 80 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 73 vs 66 on snow.

Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac 2
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A052

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Quatrac 2 or ADVAN A052?

Which is better in the wet, Quatrac 2 or ADVAN A052?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Quatrac 2 or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 80 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Quatrac 2 or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 73 vs 66 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Quatrac 2 or ADVAN A052?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Quatrac 2 or ADVAN A052?

Vredestein Quatrac 2, 69 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology