Tests 81 · 17 tests Owners 79 · 1,583 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Temp 55° F Avg speed 65-80mph 2019 M3 RWD LR Read more”
Head-to-head
Updated
Vredestein Quatrac vs Laufenn G Fit 4S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 17 + 6 road tests and 1,583 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac is ahead, 80–75
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 4 tests that measured dry braking for both, Quatrac won 4 and G Fit 4S won 0 (average 94% vs 89% of the best).
- In 4 tests that measured wet braking for both, Quatrac won 4 and G Fit 4S won 0 (average 96% vs 90% of the best).
-
81
Dry
Quatrac +972Why this score
Source Quatrac G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 6 tests 83 65 Reviews found online 78 81 Dry Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–0 94% 89% Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 98% 100% Quatrac: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 77.9 = 81
G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.3 = 72
-
92
Wet
Quatrac +785Why this score
Source Quatrac G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 6 tests 96 86 Reviews found online 86 85 Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 98% 83% Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 100% 94% Wet Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–0 96% 90% Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 98% 100% Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 100% 99% Quatrac: 60% × 95.5 + 40% × 85.9 = 92
G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85
-
74
Snow
G Fit 4S +377Why this score
Source Quatrac G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests 75 77 Reviews found online 73 77 Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 89% 93% Snow Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 94% 91% Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 97% 95% Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 91% 91% Quatrac: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 73.4 = 74
G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 76.8 = 77
-
73
Comfort
G Fit 4S +376Why this score
Source Quatrac G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests 71 72 Reviews found online 75 79 Quatrac: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 74.7 = 73
G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 78.5 = 76
-
74
Noise
Quatrac +3638Why this score
Source Quatrac G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests 78 19 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 100% 94% Quatrac: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 74
G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.5 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 38
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac or G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
75
Treadwear
Level75Why this score
Source Quatrac G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 1 tests 73 72 Reviews found online 78 79 Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 59% 79% Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 67% 80% Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 78.2 = 75
G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.6 = 75
-
77
Handling (owners)
G Fit 4S +380Why this score
Source Quatrac G Fit 4S Reviews found online 77 80 -
73
Efficiency
Quatrac +2647Why this score
Source Quatrac G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests 73 47 Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 84% 81%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Quatrac | Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 75 |
| Dry | 81 | 72 |
| Wet | 92 | 85 |
| Snow | 74 | 77 |
| Comfort | 73 | 76 |
| Noise | 74 | 38 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 80 |
| Efficiency | 73 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Quatrac
75
/ 100
G Fit 4S
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Vredestein Quatrac finished ahead 4 times and Laufenn G Fit 4S 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Quatrac | G Fit 4S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% | 89% | +5.2 | 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 100% | −1.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% | 83% | +14.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 100% | 94% | +6.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% | 90% | +6.2 | 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% | 100% | −1.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% | 99% | +1.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 89% | 93% | −4.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Snow Circle | Snow | 94% | 91% | +3.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% | 95% | +1.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Snow Slalom | Snow | 96% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 94% #9/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 91% | 91% | −0.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 78% #5/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | 92% #7/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% | 94% | +5.6 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 59% | 79% | −19.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 67% | 80% | −13.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 84% | 81% | +3.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #14/15 | #10/15 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Value | Cost | 64% | 92% | −28.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/30 | #10/30 | – | 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test · 225/40 R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Quatrac
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces
Cons
- Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
- Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
Tire B G Fit 4S
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
- High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
- Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Vredestein Quatrac
Community members widely view the Vredestein Quatrac lineup as a high-value, comfortable, and quiet alternative to more expensive premium tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Drivers frequently praise its smooth ride quality and dependable wet and light-to-moderate snow traction, though several note it does not match dedicated snow tires in severe winter conditions. Concerns occasionally arise regarding faster tread wear, shoulder chunking, and rolling resistance.
r/TeslaModelY
·5 upvotes ·2026-10-05
“23 Model Y LR....just did my first tire change at 41k miles from stock Contis to Vredestein Quatrac Pro+. Better all the way around, no foam. There is not much of a road noise difference, maybe a bit louder going over concrete sections on some highways. I don't buy into the foam theory. Noise comes from tire composition and tread hitting varying surfaces. Every tire will give a different sound and sound level, foam or not.”
r/electricvehicles
·6 upvotes ·2024-02-24
“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Experience?? Has anyone had experience with Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ tires? I got them off Tire Rack because they are supposedly EV rated... only to later find out there are specific Quadtrac EV tires (not listed on Tire Rack). I know I'll have a hit on range on my 2022 Bolt EUV because I have the original Michelins on the front and Quadtrac+s in the back but it seems very unpredictable (only reason for this is that old fronts were in VERY bad shape and wanted two new tires for safety with a 2year old). Read more”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2019-02-01
“The last week or so here we have received about 12-15 inches of snow. I have these on my 2003 Forester and must say they dig through the snow very well. The only thing that I have found is that they seem a little slick when stopping. Don't stop as well as the Blizzaks on the wife's Galant, but then again they are not a dedicated winter tire either. Have put about 3500 miles on them since July and must say for an all season tire they have performed well in all conditions.”
Top themes
#Ride comfort and low noise#Wet and rain traction#Snow and winter capability#Affordable premium alternative#Tread wear and longevity#Shoulder wear and chunking#Rolling resistance and EV range
Based on 64 community posts
Tire B
Laufenn G Fit 4S
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Quatrac | B · Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | 79 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 13″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 25 | 25 |
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac
75
/ 100
Laufenn G Fit 4S
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better noise, efficiency and dry. Pick the Laufenn G Fit 4S if snow and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 38 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want lower fuel or energy use
Vredestein Quatrac scores 73 vs 47 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Quatrac scores 81 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac scores 92 vs 85 on wet.
Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Quatrac or G Fit 4S?
Which is better in the wet, Quatrac or G Fit 4S?
Vredestein Quatrac, 92 vs 85 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Quatrac or G Fit 4S?
Vredestein Quatrac, 81 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Quatrac or G Fit 4S?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 77 vs 74 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Quatrac or G Fit 4S?
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 38 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Quatrac or G Fit 4S?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 76 vs 73 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Quatrac or G Fit 4S?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Which rolls more easily, Quatrac or G Fit 4S?
Vredestein Quatrac, 73 vs 47 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology