Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama A539 vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 105 + 213 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN A052 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama A539
Tire AYokohama

A539

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 105 reviews

Yokohama ADVAN A052
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN A052

Summer

± 5

Tests 76 · 5 tests Owners 68 · 213 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    ADVAN A052 +12
    80
    Why this score
    SourceA539ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 68 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6890

    A539: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 89.9 = 80

    No road tests of dry for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    ADVAN A052 +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceA539ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 71 (est.)78
    Reviews found online7167

    A539: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 67 = 73

    No road tests of wet for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceA539ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online–74

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    A539 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceA539ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6963

    A539: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69

    ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.1 + 60% × 62.6 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourceA539ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–77
    Reviews found online–77

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 76.5 = 77

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    A539 +17
    50
    Why this score
    SourceA539ADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online6740

    A539: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN A052 +10
    84
    Why this score
    SourceA539ADVAN A052
    Reviews found online7484
Scores at a glance
Yokohama A539 vs Yokohama ADVAN A052: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama A539Yokohama ADVAN A052
Relative Score 69 72
Dry 68 80
Wet 71 73
Snow – 73
Comfort 69 67
Noise – 77
Treadwear 67 50
Handling (owners) 74 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

A539

± 5

ADVAN A052

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A A539

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
  • Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
  • Good braking performance

Cons

  • Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
  • Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
  • Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
All owner themes in the A539 review

Tire B ADVAN A052

Pros

  • Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
  • Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
  • Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
  • Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
  • Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
All owner themes in the ADVAN A052 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama A539

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Positive

The community regards the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-performance competition tire that offers exceptional dry grip and competitive edge in autocross and track settings. Users frequently compare them favorably against other extreme performance tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R/RE-71RS, though questions remain regarding their longevity for long-distance road trips.

Top themes
#exceptional dry grip#autocross and track performance#tire longevity and wear#comparison with bridgestone#tire sizing and fitment

Based on 12 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama A539 B · Yokohama ADVAN A052
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available661
Rim diameters12″ – 14″13″ – 20″
Tread depth—7/32″
UTQG—200 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama A539

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better dry and handling. Pick the Yokohama A539 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama A539 scores 67 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 80 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 84 vs 74 on handling.

Tire A · Yokohama A539
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A052

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

A539 or ADVAN A052?

Which is better in the wet, A539 or ADVAN A052?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, A539 or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 80 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, A539 or ADVAN A052?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, A539 or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama A539, 67 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology