Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Pilot Sport 4 S is ahead, 81–70
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 59 · 2,186 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Tests 81 · 27 tests Owners 82 · 6,601 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2024 Autobild Sportscars Summer TIre Test R20 (rolling resistance)
“Am I the owner of the newer PS4s?😁 Hello everyone, new in the sub and just want to share my love for the Pilot Sport 4s. This is the third set and I love it. To me they are the perfect compromise beetween performance anche tyre wear. Last set last me 43k km, I do lot of highway and some spirited drive when possibile. I also had a set of Sport Contact 7, awesome grip, to me better than the PS4s, almost too much for my stock Golf. They also wear out faster. I saw yesterday the review of Potenza Sport Evo and they promise very week, maybe next time I’ll try!”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 89 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 100% |
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 85 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 86% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 95% | 98% |
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 14 | – |
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 62 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 81 |
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 61 | – |
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 71 |
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 71 | 86 |
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 81 |
| Dry | 74 | 91 |
| Wet | 68 | 85 |
| Snow | 36 | – |
| Comfort | 63 | 75 |
| Noise | 69 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 71 |
| Handling | 71 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ADVAN Fleva V701
Pilot Sport 4 S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Pilot Sport 4 S | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | 97% #3/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | +0.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #9/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test | −0.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2024 Autobild Sportscars Summer TIre Test R20 | −17.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 96% #5/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | +4.2 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 40% #6/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | +31.1 | Different tests |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Other | 85% #2/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | 62% #6/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | +23.1 | Same test |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 7% #15/43 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Shootout | 50% #2/10 · 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test | −43.3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 93% #6/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | −0.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2020 EVO UHP Summer Tyre Test | −44.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 86% #18/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2020 EVO UHP Summer Tyre Test | −13.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/7 · 2020 EVO UHP Summer Tyre Test | −3.8 | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
Based on 22 community posts
The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S as a benchmark max-performance summer tire, praising its outstanding dry and wet grip, stability, and daily driving refinement. Common criticisms focus on its premium price, rapid tread wear on high-powered heavy vehicles or hot track sessions, and significantly reduced grip in cold weather. Many enthusiasts consider it an ideal street tire, though some note softer sidewalls compared to predecessors or recommend dedicated track tires for hard circuit driving.
“I was running pilot sport 4s on my MS. (19” wheels) I was lucky to get 13,000-14,000. I just switched to Kumho Majesty 9’s for about 1/3 the price. Currently have 4,000 miles on them and just to rotated. Fingers crossed I can get 13,000 miles out of them.”
“I run the all seasons on my Golf because I drive ~400+ miles per week in all matter of weather. The high tread wear rating and all-weather grip make more sense for me. But, having run the max performance PS4s before, if you’re cool with having two sets, they are basically impossible to beat. Absolute magic tires.”
“New tires Pilot Sport 4s got some new Pilot Sport 4s in 245/40/18. way different to my yokohama advan AS+. a lot more grip, obviously. very minimal to no sidewall flex. very good tires. i had pilot sport 3's on my 2013 hatchback wrx back in the day. feels good to get back on some good tires again. Read more”
Based on 208 community posts
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 70 | 110 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 91 vs 74 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 85 vs 68 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 86 vs 71 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 75 vs 63 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.
