tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 vs Bridgestone Potenza S007A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 1 road tests and 497 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ADVAN Sport V105 70, Potenza S007A 69.

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Sport V105 Check price on Amazon · Potenza S007A
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Sport V105

Summer

± 5

Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 67 · 497 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Tread Life on the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”

Bridgestone Potenza S007A
Tire BBridgestone

Potenza S007A

Summer

± 7Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    ADVAN Sport V105 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Potenza S007A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests73≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7469

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 73.5 = 73

    Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    ADVAN Sport V105 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Potenza S007A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests72≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7267

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72 + 40% × 72.4 = 72

    Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Potenza S007A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online54–

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    ADVAN Sport V105 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Potenza S007A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6664

    ADVAN Sport V105: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67

    Potenza S007A: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 64.2 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Sport V105 or Potenza S007A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 59

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Potenza S007A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests53–
    Reviews found online67–

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 53.1 + 40% × 67.3 = 59

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Potenza S007A +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Potenza S007A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7070
    Reviews found online6164
    Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–062%62%

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.8 = 66

    Potenza S007A: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 64.3 = 68

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza S007A +4
    76
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Potenza S007A
    Reviews found online7276
  8. 59

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Potenza S007A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests59–
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Sport V105Bridgestone Potenza S007A
Relative Score 70 69
Dry 73 69
Wet 72 68
Snow 60 –
Comfort 67 66
Noise 59 –
Treadwear 66 68
Handling (owners) 72 76
Efficiency 59 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

ADVAN Sport V105

± 7

Potenza S007A

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 finished ahead 0 times and Bridgestone Potenza S007A 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryADVAN Sport V105Potenza S007AΔHead-to-head
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Treadwear 62% 62% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #16/22 #11/22 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Sport V105

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet road conditions
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and high cornering stability
  • Competitive pricing offering great value relative to flagship alternatives

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly under spirited or track driving
  • Noticeable road noise on certain vehicles or rough road surfaces
  • Subpar performance and lack of confidence in snow and freezing temperatures
All owner themes in the ADVAN Sport V105 review

Tire B Potenza S007A

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and high-speed cornering stability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing precise steering response and excellent feedback
  • Strong track-day performance with improved lap times compared to predecessor models

Cons

  • Subpar wet weather traction and aquaplaning resistance, especially when pushed
  • Poor performance and sliding tendencies in colder temperatures
  • Fast tread wear under aggressive driving conditions
All owner themes in the Potenza S007A review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed impressions regarding the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, highlighting both praise for its wet and dry handling along with debates surrounding its tread life. While some drivers report surprisingly durable treadwear and good overall value, others cite reports of poor tread life and note that ride comfort and road noise may trail competitor offerings.

northamericanmotoring.com

“Advan Sport V105 does get a good tirerack review: Comes in 205/55-16 (three models. Mercedes W and V speed rated and 2010 Production) $83-86 each Not as comfortable or quiet as other Max Summer tires but handles well in both dry and wet. If you prefer to keep the 205/50-16 tire size then for street use and daily driving with a slightly higher budget: Michelin Premier A/S Grand Touring All Season $132 each 640 treadwear, V speed rated, 19 lbs. Tirerack test result- Good blend of comfort and handling with much longer treadlife.”
r/WRX ·1 upvote ·2020-03-08

“I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”
Top themes
#tread life longevity#dry and wet handling#comparison to Michelin PS4S#ride comfort and noise#OEM fitment evaluation#daily driving performance

Based on 7 community posts

Tire B

Bridgestone Potenza S007A

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 B · Bridgestone Potenza S007A
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1443
Rim diameters16″ – 23″18″ – 20″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG240 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Bridgestone Potenza S007A

Too close to call: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 and Bridgestone Potenza S007A are within 2 points overall. Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 is stronger on dry and wet. Bridgestone Potenza S007A rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 72 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza S007A
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN Sport V105 or Potenza S007A?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Sport V105 or Potenza S007A?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Sport V105 or Potenza S007A?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Sport V105 or Potenza S007A?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN Sport V105 or Potenza S007A?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology