Toyo Proxes TQ looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 vs Toyo Proxes TQ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 0 road tests and 497 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Sport V105 is ahead, 68–43

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Sport V105

Summer

± 6

Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 67 · 497 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Tread Life on the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”

Toyo Proxes TQ
Tire BToyo

Proxes TQ

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 28 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    ADVAN Sport V105 +16
    57
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Proxes TQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests73≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7452

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 73.5 = 73

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    ADVAN Sport V105 +40
    32
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Proxes TQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests72≈ 41 (est.)
    Reviews found online7218

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72 + 40% × 72.4 = 72

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 41.5 (est.) + 40% × 17.8 = 32

    No road tests of wet for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    ADVAN Sport V105 +27
    33
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Proxes TQ
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 48 (est.)
    Reviews found online5410

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 60

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 48 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    ADVAN Sport V105 +13
    54
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Proxes TQ
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6646

    ADVAN Sport V105: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67

    Proxes TQ: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 46.1 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Sport V105 or Proxes TQ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 59

    Noise

    Proxes TQ +2
    61
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Proxes TQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests53≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6752

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 53.1 + 40% × 67.2 = 59

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Proxes TQ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Sport V105 +34
    32
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Proxes TQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 46 (est.)
    Reviews found online6110

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.7 = 66

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 46.4 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 32

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Sport V105 +28
    44
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Proxes TQ
    Reviews found online7244
  8. 59

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Proxes TQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests59–
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 vs Toyo Proxes TQ: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Sport V105Toyo Proxes TQ
Relative Score 68 43
Dry 73 57
Wet 72 32
Snow 60 33
Comfort 67 54
Noise 59 61
Treadwear 66 32
Handling (owners) 72 44
Efficiency 59 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

ADVAN Sport V105

± 8

Proxes TQ

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Sport V105

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet road conditions
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and high cornering stability
  • Competitive pricing offering great value relative to flagship alternatives

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly under spirited or track driving
  • Noticeable road noise on certain vehicles or rough road surfaces
  • Subpar performance and lack of confidence in snow and freezing temperatures
All owner themes in the ADVAN Sport V105 review

Tire B Proxes TQ

Pros

  • Exceptional straight-line traction and launch capability for high-horsepower applications
  • Competitive pricing compared to other drag radial alternatives
  • Surprisingly quiet operation during normal street driving

Cons

  • Dangerous handling characteristics in heavy rain or standing water
  • Noticeable sidewall flex during aggressive cornering or rapid steering inputs
  • Requires proper heat cycling/warming to achieve maximum performance
All owner themes in the Proxes TQ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed impressions regarding the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, highlighting both praise for its wet and dry handling along with debates surrounding its tread life. While some drivers report surprisingly durable treadwear and good overall value, others cite reports of poor tread life and note that ride comfort and road noise may trail competitor offerings.

Top themes
#tread life longevity#dry and wet handling#comparison to Michelin PS4S#ride comfort and noise#OEM fitment evaluation#daily driving performance

Based on 7 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes TQ

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 B · Toyo Proxes TQ
CategorySummerSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1444
Rim diameters16″ – 23″16″ – 18″
Tread depth9/32″6 - 7/32″
UTQG240 A AB B
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Toyo Proxes TQ

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better wet, treadwear and handling. Where the Toyo Proxes TQ is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Toyo Proxes TQ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 72 vs 32 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 66 vs 32 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 72 vs 44 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 60 vs 33 on snow.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Tire B · Toyo Proxes TQ

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN Sport V105 or Proxes TQ?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Sport V105 or Proxes TQ?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 72 vs 32 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Sport V105 or Proxes TQ?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 73 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ADVAN Sport V105 or Proxes TQ?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 60 vs 33 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ADVAN Sport V105 or Proxes TQ?

Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 61 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Sport V105 or Proxes TQ?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 67 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN Sport V105 or Proxes TQ?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 66 vs 32 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology