tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 85 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–67

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or AVID TOURING-S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6777

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +8
    76
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online6778

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 68

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76

    No road tests of wet for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Snow

    Crugen HT51 +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5970

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 63

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    No road tests of snow for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6671

    AVID TOURING-S: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for AVID TOURING-S or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6979

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 67

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 72

    No road tests of noise for AVID TOURING-S or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    AVID TOURING-S +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)58
    Reviews found online7076

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SCrugen HT51
    Reviews found online–74
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama AVID TOURING-SKumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 67 72
Dry 67 74
Wet 68 76
Snow 63 70
Comfort 67 70
Noise 67 72
Treadwear 68 65
Handling (owners) – 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

AVID TOURING-S

± 8

Crugen HT51

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AVID TOURING-S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available2844
Rim diameters15″ – 17″15″ – 22″
Tread depth11/32″12.5/32″
UTQG620 A B720 A A
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallWhitewallBlackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common88

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

Kumho Crugen HT51

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better wet, dry and snow. Pick the Yokohama AVID TOURING-S if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 76 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 72 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AVID TOURING-S or Crugen HT51?

Which is better in the wet, AVID TOURING-S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AVID TOURING-S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, AVID TOURING-S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, AVID TOURING-S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, AVID TOURING-S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AVID TOURING-S or Crugen HT51?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology