Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich Advantage Control vs Hankook Dynapro H/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 5 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Advantage Control is ahead, 68–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Advantage Control +1453Why this score
Source Advantage Control Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 67 45 Advantage Control: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 53
No road tests of dry for Advantage Control. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
75
Wet
Advantage Control +2154Why this score
Source Advantage Control Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 77 47 Advantage Control: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 54
No road tests of wet for Advantage Control. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
Advantage Control +1156Why this score
Source Advantage Control Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 65 47 Advantage Control: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 67
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 56
No road tests of snow for Advantage Control. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
69
Comfort
Advantage Control +1653Why this score
Source Advantage Control Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 68 45 Advantage Control: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 68.4 = 69
Dynapro H/T: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 45.1 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Advantage Control or Dynapro H/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Advantage Control Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 64 – Advantage Control: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 65
No road tests of noise for Advantage Control. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Advantage Control +853Why this score
Source Advantage Control Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 55 ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 69 44 Advantage Control: 60% × 55.2 + 40% × 68.9 = 61
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Advantage Control +2443Why this score
Source Advantage Control Dynapro H/T Reviews found online 67 43
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage Control | Hankook Dynapro H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 53 |
| Dry | 67 | 53 |
| Wet | 75 | 54 |
| Snow | 67 | 56 |
| Comfort | 69 | 53 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 61 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 43 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Advantage Control
53
/ 100
Dynapro H/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advantage Control
Pros
- Noticeably quieter operation compared to previous high-performance tires
- Even and long-lasting tread wear
- Reliable all-weather and daily-driver performance
Cons
- Dry grip is rated as good rather than great for spirited driving
- Average steering feedback and comfort levels
- Limited grip in more severe snow and ice conditions
Tire B Dynapro H/T
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and quiet ride
- High comfort and smooth highway performance
- Balanced wet and dry braking for casual driving
Cons
- Terrible winter and snow traction due to hard rubber compound
- Poor wet traction leading to wheel spin on acceleration
- Severe balancing and out-of-round issues reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage Control | B · Hankook Dynapro H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 79 | 5 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 21″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 - 700 B A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
BFGoodrich Advantage Control
53
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro H/T
Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage Control — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich Advantage Control rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro H/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich Advantage Control scores 67 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich Advantage Control scores 75 vs 54 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich Advantage Control scores 69 vs 53 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich Advantage Control scores 67 vs 53 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage Control
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro H/T
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advantage Control or Dynapro H/T?
Which is better in the wet, Advantage Control or Dynapro H/T?
BFGoodrich Advantage Control, 75 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage Control or Dynapro H/T?
BFGoodrich Advantage Control, 67 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Advantage Control or Dynapro H/T?
BFGoodrich Advantage Control, 67 vs 56 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Advantage Control or Dynapro H/T?
BFGoodrich Advantage Control, 69 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advantage Control or Dynapro H/T?
BFGoodrich Advantage Control, 61 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology