Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,575 + 86 owner reviews. How we score
All-Terrain T/A KO2 is ahead, 72–67
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 1,575 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 86 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 65 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
Grabber AT2: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 60 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 72
Grabber AT2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 71 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75
Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 70 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70
Grabber AT2: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.6 = 69
No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 61 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 69
Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 64
No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2 or Grabber AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 77 |
All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73
Grabber AT2: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO2 | Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 69 | 62 |
| Category | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | General Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 67 |
| Dry | 73 | 66 |
| Wet | 72 | 63 |
| Snow | 75 | 71 |
| Comfort | 70 | 69 |
| Noise | 69 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
All-Terrain T/A KO2
Grabber AT2
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
“No opinion here between the Yokohamas or Falkens (both of which I would definitely put on my Outback ) but in my experience the BFG KOs are way too much tire for the Outback . I put a set of 4 on my 2013 Outback and quickly discovered that other than looking great, and being virtually bulletproof, everything else about them is a downside. Rough ride, lot of road noise, lost about 2 mpg in fuel cost, and very heavy when I did my tire rotations, which BFG says you should do every 3,000 miles to prevent excess wear. Like they say about many things, the two happiest days in my 2013 Outback ’s life were the day I put the KO2s on, and the day, after about 10,000 miles, I replaced them with “regular” tires . Great tires for a heavier vehicle, but too much for the relatively light Outback . I’ve read many Outback owner’s reviews being very happy with the Wildpeaks AND Geolanders. Sounds like that person has an agenda.”
“BFGoodrich KO2s are an excellent choice That is all. We got whacked with that big winter weather system here in Michigan last week. My '21 Sport is fitted with 235/75R15 KO2s and I finally got a feel for their cold/snow/ice performance characteristics. My opinion is favorable. They were good enough in 5-6" of loose powder, felt planted in melty slush, but mostly impressed me on glazed ice. Didn't encounter any hardpack snow, so can't really comment on how they'll do with that, but I expect they'll perform well on that surface also. I've been running at 38 psi, seems to work okay. Road noise is minimal. Fuel economy took a giant hit, though. I have no empirical measurements to back my observations, but it appears I've taken about an 8 MPG penalty. It only gets worse with speed, too. Highway miles eat even more gas than regular surface streets. Makes sense, given the nature of these tires. To be fair, however, I knew this would happen and accept the loss. For me and my goals with my Crosstrek build, the fuel economy loss is made up for with the improved grip under any road surface I've thrown at it yet. Just wanted to share my experience so far. I'm not disappointed. Read more”
Based on 395 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 | B · General Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 44 psi |
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
General Grabber AT2
Winner: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 72 vs 63 on wet.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 73 vs 66 on dry.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 62 on handling.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 64 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 72 vs 63 on our wet score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 73 vs 66 on our dry score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 75 vs 71 on our snow score.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology