tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 vs General Grabber AT2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 200 + 86 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: All-Terrain T/A KO3 66, Grabber AT2 67.

Check price on Amazon · All-Terrain T/A KO3 Check price on Amazon · Grabber AT2
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3
Tire ABFGoodrich

All-Terrain T/A KO3

All-Terrain tire

± 9

Tests 56 · 1 test Owners 76 · 200 reviews

Best test result: #7 of 30 in 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test (snow handling (tester's mark))

General Grabber AT2
Tire BGeneral

Grabber AT2

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 86 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Grabber AT2 +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO3Grabber AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests54≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7565

    All-Terrain T/A KO3: 60% × 53.6 + 40% × 74.9 = 62

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Level
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO3Grabber AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests54≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7660

    All-Terrain T/A KO3: 60% × 54.1 + 40% × 75.7 = 63

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63

    No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Grabber AT2 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO3Grabber AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests60≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7571

    All-Terrain T/A KO3: 60% × 59.7 + 40% × 75.3 = 66

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71

    No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Grabber AT2 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO3Grabber AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests60≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6869

    All-Terrain T/A KO3: 40% × 60.4 + 60% × 68 = 65

    Grabber AT2: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 63

    Noise

    Grabber AT2 +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO3Grabber AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests63≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6360

    All-Terrain T/A KO3: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 62.5 = 63

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    All-Terrain T/A KO3 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO3Grabber AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8278

    All-Terrain T/A KO3: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 76

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    All-Terrain T/A KO3 +14
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAll-Terrain T/A KO3Grabber AT2
    Reviews found online7561
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3General Grabber AT2
Relative Score 66 67
Dry 62 66
Wet 63 63
Snow 66 71
Comfort 65 69
Noise 63 64
Treadwear 76 73
Handling (owners) 75 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

All-Terrain T/A KO3

± 7

Grabber AT2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A All-Terrain T/A KO3

Pros

  • Significantly quieter and more comfortable on-road ride compared to the KO2 and factory alternatives
  • Exceptional off-road grip on dirt, gravel, and rough forest service trails
  • Strong braking performance across various surfaces including snow and dirt

Cons

  • Consistent balancing and high road force issues reported by some users, leading to steering wheel wobble
  • Subpar ice traction, as is common for standard all-terrain tires not designated as dedicated winter options
  • Slower on-center steering response compared to competing light truck tires
All owner themes in the All-Terrain T/A KO3 review

Tire B Grabber AT2

Pros

  • Excellent off-road grip in mud, sand, and dirt
  • Impressively low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
  • Long-lasting tread life and durability

Cons

  • Subpar or dangerous wet-weather and wet-tarmac grip reported by some users
  • Thin sidewalls susceptible to punctures from sharp rocks during serious off-roading
  • Tendency for some tires to go out of shape or cup over time, causing increased noise
All owner themes in the Grabber AT2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 B · General Grabber AT2
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available922
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″
Tread depth15 - 16/32″14/32″
UTQG—640 A B
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White LetteringOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure35 - 80 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3

General Grabber AT2

Too close to call: BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 and General Grabber AT2 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 is stronger on handling and treadwear. General Grabber AT2 is stronger on snow, dry and comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 scores 75 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber AT2 scores 71 vs 66 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber AT2 scores 66 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber AT2 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber AT2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

All-Terrain T/A KO3 or Grabber AT2?

Which is better in the wet, All-Terrain T/A KO3 or Grabber AT2?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, All-Terrain T/A KO3 or Grabber AT2?

General Grabber AT2, 66 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, All-Terrain T/A KO3 or Grabber AT2?

General Grabber AT2, 71 vs 66 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, All-Terrain T/A KO3 or Grabber AT2?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, All-Terrain T/A KO3 or Grabber AT2?

General Grabber AT2, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, All-Terrain T/A KO3 or Grabber AT2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3, 76 vs 73 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology