tirewheelguide

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler vs BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 24 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force Profiler 2 is ahead, 80–71

Check price on Amazon · g-Force Profiler 2 or g-Force Profiler on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    g-Force Profiler 2 +10
    80
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profilerg-Force Profiler 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online7287

    g-Force Profiler: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70

    g-Force Profiler 2: 60% × 76 (est.) + 40% × 87 = 80

    No road tests of dry for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 73

    Wet

    g-Force Profiler 2 +8
    81
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profilerg-Force Profiler 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 79 (est.)
    Reviews found online7485

    g-Force Profiler: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73

    g-Force Profiler 2: 60% × 78.9 (est.) + 40% × 85.4 = 81

    No road tests of wet for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    g-Force Profiler 2 +10
    77
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profilerg-Force Profiler 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6681

    g-Force Profiler: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.8 = 67

    g-Force Profiler 2: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 80.8 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force Profiler or g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 74

    Treadwear

    g-Force Profiler 2 +2
    76
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profilerg-Force Profiler 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7983

    g-Force Profiler: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 74

    g-Force Profiler 2: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 76

    No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 67

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force Profiler 2 +17
    84
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profilerg-Force Profiler 2
    Reviews found online6784
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force ProfilerBFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
Relative Score 71 80
Dry 70 80
Wet 73 81
Comfort 67 77
Treadwear 74 76
Handling (owners) 67 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force Profiler

± 8

g-Force Profiler 2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Profiler

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip across a range of temperatures
  • Impressive tread life and long-lasting durability
  • High value for money at an affordable price point

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in heavy snow and winter weather
  • Can be noisy on wet tarmac
  • Firm or crashy ride quality over rough road surfaces
All owner themes in the g-Force Profiler review

Tire B g-Force Profiler 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability compared to premium competitors.
  • High levels of confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions.
  • Stiff sidewall design provides excellent cornering feedback and agility.

Cons

  • Some reports of increased road noise compared to quieter touring tires.
  • Requires a short warm-up period to reach optimal operating temperature for maximum grip.
  • Occasional reports of tracking or 'riding' road ridges due to high grip levels.
All owner themes in the g-Force Profiler 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler B · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 84 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 80 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 77 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 81 vs 73 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Profiler or g-Force Profiler 2?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Profiler or g-Force Profiler 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2, 81 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Profiler or g-Force Profiler 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2, 80 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Profiler or g-Force Profiler 2?

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2, 77 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Profiler or g-Force Profiler 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 76 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology