tirewheelguide

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler vs BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 102 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force Profiler leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · g-Force Profiler or Trail-Terrain T/A on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Trail-Terrain T/A +1
    71
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force ProfilerTrail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7173

    g-Force Profiler: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    No road tests of dry for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    g-Force Profiler +8
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force ProfilerTrail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7363

    g-Force Profiler: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 73

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65

    No road tests of wet for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force ProfilerTrail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online–82

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77

    No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    g-Force Profiler +1
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force ProfilerTrail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6564

    g-Force Profiler: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force ProfilerTrail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–69

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    g-Force Profiler +2
    72
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force ProfilerTrail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7975

    g-Force Profiler: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 74

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force Profiler +3
    64
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force ProfilerTrail-Terrain T/A
    Reviews found online6764
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force ProfilerBFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Relative Score 71 68
Dry 70 71
Wet 73 65
Snow – 77
Comfort 66 65
Noise – 67
Treadwear 74 72
Handling (owners) 67 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force Profiler

± 8

Trail-Terrain T/A

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryg-Force ProfilerTrail-Terrain T/AΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/44 2012 Autobild 50 Tyre Braking Test #8/8 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Profiler

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip across a range of temperatures
  • Impressive tread life and long-lasting durability
  • High value for money at an affordable price point

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in heavy snow and winter weather
  • Can be noisy on wet tarmac
  • Firm or crashy ride quality over rough road surfaces
All owner themes in the g-Force Profiler review

Tire B Trail-Terrain T/A

Pros

  • Low road noise for an all-terrain tire, with several reviewers calling it quieter than previous tires such as the AT3 and other all-terrains
  • Strong snow and ice performance, including a Colorado snowstorm and multiple Alps trips with up to a foot of snow
  • Comfortable, smooth ride and good handling and braking on the road

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction reported by several reviewers, including wheelspin, lack of confidence on wet roads and ABS activation issues
  • Some reviewers found road noise high on paved surfaces, and one called it outrageously noisy, though others found it quiet
  • Wear is faster for some owners, with one set nearing replacement after about 20,000 miles and two years
All owner themes in the Trail-Terrain T/A review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler B · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—50
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—11 - 13/32″
UTQG—660 A A - B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure—44 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A

Narrow edge: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler — better wet. Where the BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 73 vs 65 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Profiler or Trail-Terrain T/A?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Profiler or Trail-Terrain T/A?

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler, 73 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Profiler or Trail-Terrain T/A?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Profiler or Trail-Terrain T/A?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Profiler or Trail-Terrain T/A?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology