Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 18 road tests and 30 + 1,593 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: g-Force Winter 2 79, Quatrac 80.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
± 5

Tests 78 · 21 tests Owners 83 · 30 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (snow braking)

Vredestein Quatrac

Quatrac

All Season

± 4

Tests 81 · 18 tests Owners 78 · 1,593 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)

“Vredestein Quatrac and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 are good tyres. I prefer the vredestein quite comfortable tyres and quieter than the Hankook. But you can't go wrong with either of them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Quatrac +12
    81
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 18 tests6283
    Reviews found online8078

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 62.1 + 40% × 80.3 = 69

    Quatrac: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 77.6 = 81

  2. 87

    Wet

    Quatrac +4
    91
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 18 tests8695
    Reviews found online8985

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 86 + 40% × 88.6 = 87

    Quatrac: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 85.2 = 91

  3. 89

    Snow

    g-Force Winter 2 +15
    74
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 13 tests9474
    Reviews found online8273

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 93.7 + 40% × 82 = 89

    Quatrac: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 72.9 = 74

  4. 78

    Comfort

    g-Force Winter 2 +4
    74
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests6774
    Reviews found online8574

    g-Force Winter 2: 40% × 66.7 + 60% × 85.2 = 78

    Quatrac: 40% × 74.5 + 60% × 73.8 = 74

  5. 76

    Noise

    g-Force Winter 2 +2
    74
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 13 tests8278
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76

    Quatrac: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74

    No owner ratings of noise for g-Force Winter 2 or Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    g-Force Winter 2 +1
    75
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 7 tests7373
    Reviews found online8277

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 81.7 = 76

    Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 77 = 75

  7. 85

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force Winter 2 +9
    76
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Quatrac
    Reviews found online8576
  8. 65

    Efficiency

    Quatrac +8
    73
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 13 tests6573
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2Vredestein Quatrac
Relative Score 79 80
Dry 69 81
Wet 87 91
Snow 89 74
Comfort 78 74
Noise 76 74
Treadwear 76 75
Handling (owners) 85 76
Efficiency 65 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

g-Force Winter 2

± 4

Quatrac

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryg-Force Winter 2QuatracΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 94% #12/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 90% #8/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #19/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 99% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 99% #2/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 85% #5/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #6/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 93% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 86% #11/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 89% #12/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 94% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 95% #17/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 99% #3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #13/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 99% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Ice Braking Snow 89% #11/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 91% #13/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 99% #3/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 93% #7/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 99% #6/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 99% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Slalom Snow 99% #9/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 96% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 100% #2/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 96% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 84% #10/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 78% #5/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #10/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 98% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Abrasion Treadwear 91% #2/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 80% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 95% #7/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 95% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 96% #7/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 96% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 97% #5/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 93% #3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 64% #18/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 77% #6/15 · 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #14/20 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test #14/15 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 69% #13/20 · 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 64% #12/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #11/20 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test #2/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Winter 2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
  • Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
  • Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
  • Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the g-Force Winter 2 review

Tire B Quatrac

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces

Cons

  • Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
  • Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
All owner themes in the Quatrac review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers viewing it as one of the best mid-range all-weather tires available. Users frequently praise its reliable traction in wet and snowy conditions, along with its quiet and comfortable ride compared to rivals. While some owners note that stopping distances on ice or deep snow do not match dedicated winter tires and tread wear can vary, most consider it an exceptional value over premium brands like Michelin.

Top themes
#mid-range tire value#snow and winter performance#wet weather traction#quiet and comfortable ride#tread life longevity#all-weather capability

Based on 34 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 B · Vredestein Quatrac
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7539
Rim diameters14″ – 20″15″ – 18″
UTQG—180 A B
Sizes in common2828

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

Vredestein Quatrac

Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 and Vredestein Quatrac are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is stronger on snow, handling and comfort. Vredestein Quatrac is stronger on dry, efficiency and wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 74 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac scores 81 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 76 on handling.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Vredestein Quatrac scores 73 vs 65 on efficiency.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 91 vs 87 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 81 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, g-Force Winter 2 or Quatrac?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 89 vs 74 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, g-Force Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Winter 2 or Quatrac?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 78 vs 74 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, g-Force Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 73 vs 65 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology