tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 122 + 370 owner reviews. How we score

Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Grabber A/TX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/TX
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7369

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7875

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 76

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6967

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 70

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +6
    63
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6959

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.4 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6660

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7272

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Grabber A/TX
    Reviews found online–58
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3General Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 72 70
Dry 71 69
Wet 76 74
Snow 70 69
Comfort 69 63
Noise 66 64
Treadwear 70 70
Handling (owners) – 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

± 7

Grabber A/TX

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

Pros

  • Outstanding off-road and mud traction
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Impressive tread wear and longevity

Cons

  • Do not perform quite as well as dedicated road tires during on-road driving
All owner themes in the Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

5thgenrams.com ·2019-12-14

“Not sure where those ratings are from but all the ratings I have seen on the tire have been on par with other at tires. all 4 cost me 765 installed. My traction in NEPA has been excellent in the snow and wet.”
f150forum.com

“Got tired of my stock tires looking undersized with my 2" level, so I finally put new ones on last week. I had KO2's on my last truck and was planning on going with them again, but I couldn't find the size I wanted at a decent price locally. I started reading reviews on TireRack and the General Grabber A/Tx gets the highest rating. I really liked the look and price, so I had my local Tire Discounters get me a set. These things are awesome. Very quiet and a smooth ride. I went with the LT285/60 20's (33.5") and they really fill out the wheel wells like they should.”
ram-trx.com ·3 upvotes ·2025-01-03

“We finally go out first snow storm of winter. We have 8” of fresh snow on the ground, and below that a half an inch of ice (it rained first then snowed). Initial impressions of the General Grabber A/Tx is good. Way quieter than stock tires on the highway, and good traction on snow and ice.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2744
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth18/32″14 - 17/32″
UTQG—640 A A - B
SidewallRaised Black LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure45 - 80 psi35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common1717

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

General Grabber A/TX

Narrow edge: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 — better comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 69 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Grabber A/TX?

Which is better in the wet, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology