Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 102 reviews
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs General Grabber AT3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 102 + 251 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber AT3 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 251 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“How long have I got? Grabber at3s, plenty of tread but I’m seeing some cracks forming. Are these something I need to be concerned about imminently or am I safe to continue driving for a few more months?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Level71Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 73 78 Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 93% 98% Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
Grabber AT3: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 77.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
65
Wet
Grabber AT3 +772Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 63 78 Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 65% 77% Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 88% 93% Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 81% 95% Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 93% 97% Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65
Grabber AT3: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 78.1 = 72
No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Snow
Trail-Terrain T/A +275Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 82 73 Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 100% 98% Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 100% 94% Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77
Grabber AT3: 60% × 77 + 40% × 72.9 = 75
No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
Grabber AT3 +1075Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 64 77 Trail-Terrain T/A: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65
Grabber AT3: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Noise
Grabber AT3 +572Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 69 ≈ 66 (est.) Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 67
Grabber AT3: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72
No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Grabber AT3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
Grabber AT3 +476Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 75 82 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
Grabber AT3: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 81.6 = 76
No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Grabber AT3 +1074Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Grabber AT3 Reviews found online 64 74 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison52Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 52
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | General Grabber AT3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 73 |
| Dry | 71 | 71 |
| Wet | 65 | 72 |
| Snow | 77 | 75 |
| Comfort | 65 | 75 |
| Noise | 67 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 74 |
| Efficiency | – | 52 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Trail-Terrain T/A
Grabber AT3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A finished ahead 0 times and General Grabber AT3 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Trail-Terrain T/A | Grabber AT3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% | 98% | −4.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 65% | 77% | −12.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 88% | 93% | −4.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 81% | 95% | −13.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 93% | 97% | −3.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 100% | 98% | +1.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 100% | 94% | +6.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 95% | 94% | +0.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 | #3/8 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Trail-Terrain T/A
Pros
- Low road noise for an all-terrain tire, with several reviewers calling it quieter than previous tires such as the AT3 and other all-terrains
- Strong snow and ice performance, including a Colorado snowstorm and multiple Alps trips with up to a foot of snow
- Comfortable, smooth ride and good handling and braking on the road
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction reported by several reviewers, including wheelspin, lack of confidence on wet roads and ABS activation issues
- Some reviewers found road noise high on paved surfaces, and one called it outrageously noisy, though others found it quiet
- Wear is faster for some owners, with one set nearing replacement after about 20,000 miles and two years
Tire B Grabber AT3
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise for an all-terrain tire, maintaining high highway comfort
- Strong on-road handling and grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Reliable light off-road traction, particularly on grass, gravel, dirt tracks, and light mud
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to vulnerability against sharp stones, flints, or tree stumps
- Subpar performance on compacted snow and ice compared to dedicated winter tires
- Tread can pack up and struggle in deep, heavy, or extremely soft mud
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General Grabber AT3
Community feedback for the General Grabber AT3 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong tread longevity, smooth ride comfort, and low road noise. Drivers also appreciate its off-road capability in gravel, mud, and snow, though occasional questions arise regarding sidewall damage, cracking, and tire sizing fitment.
“I've always used KO2s but was getting really low miles out of a set on my 1 ton van for some reason. Switched to AT3s and pretty happy with them.”
“I have at3’s on my 19 f250 , I love them 23,000 miles on them and maybe I’m halfway into the tread life . I’m easily getting at least 40,000 miles out of them probably close to 50,000 till I get a new set .”
“Only got 32K on them and installed General Grabber AT3. Took a 2000 mile trip and I think the all terrain tires ride better and look bad ***.”
Based on 20 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | B · General Grabber AT3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 50 | 77 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11 - 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 660 A A - B | 560 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 37 | 37 |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
General Grabber AT3
Narrow edge: General Grabber AT3 — better comfort, handling and wet. Where the BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 65 on comfort.
General Grabber AT3 scores 74 vs 64 on handling.
General Grabber AT3 scores 72 vs 65 on wet.
General Grabber AT3 scores 72 vs 67 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Trail-Terrain T/A or Grabber AT3?
Which is better in the wet, Trail-Terrain T/A or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 72 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Trail-Terrain T/A or Grabber AT3?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Trail-Terrain T/A or Grabber AT3?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 75 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Trail-Terrain T/A or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 72 vs 67 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Trail-Terrain T/A or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Trail-Terrain T/A or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 76 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology