Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 100 reviews
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 100 + 186 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Trail-Terrain T/A and DynaPro A/TM RF10 are level at 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Level73Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 76 77 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +574Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 69 75 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
77
Snow
Trail-Terrain T/A +1265Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 82 62 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 77
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +372Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 69 75 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +170Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 71 73 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 69
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
Level71Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 75 75 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 71
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +271Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A DynaPro A/TM RF10 Reviews found online 69 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 73 | 73 |
| Wet | 69 | 74 |
| Snow | 77 | 65 |
| Comfort | 69 | 72 |
| Noise | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Trail-Terrain T/A
DynaPro A/TM RF10
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Trail-Terrain T/A | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Trail-Terrain T/A
Pros
- Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain tire
- Excellent traction and predictability in snow and winter conditions
- Good ride comfort and smoothness on paved roads
Cons
- Some users report poor wet weather traction and rear-wheel slippage
- A minority of reviewers noted high noise levels on paved tarmac
- Concerns regarding longevity with some users experiencing faster tread wear
Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 50 | 29 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11 - 13/32″ | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | 660 A A - B | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 20 | 20 |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Too close to call: BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A and Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A is stronger on snow. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on wet and comfort.
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 77 vs 65 on snow.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 69 on wet.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 69 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Trail-Terrain T/A or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Which is better in the wet, Trail-Terrain T/A or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Trail-Terrain T/A or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Trail-Terrain T/A or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 77 vs 65 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Trail-Terrain T/A or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Trail-Terrain T/A or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Trail-Terrain T/A or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology