Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 5 reviews
Bridgestone Dueler H/L 33 vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 18 road tests and 5 + 1,265 owner reviews. How we score
EUROALL SEASON AS210 is ahead, 71–65
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 18 tests Owners 68 · 1,265 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)
“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Level66Why this score
Source Dueler H/L 33 EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 64 64 Dueler H/L 33: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 66
EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 64 = 66
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L 33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
67
Wet
EUROALL SEASON AS210 +1077Why this score
Source Dueler H/L 33 EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 65 71 Dueler H/L 33: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67
EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.9 = 77
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L 33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source Dueler H/L 33 EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 64 Reviews found online – 66 EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 66.1 = 65
-
64
Comfort
EUROALL SEASON AS210 +266Why this score
Source Dueler H/L 33 EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 62 62 Dueler H/L 33: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 61.5 = 64
EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 72.7 + 60% × 62.3 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L 33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison45Why this score
Source Dueler H/L 33 EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 31 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 30.8 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 45
No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
EUROALL SEASON AS210 +1475Why this score
Source Dueler H/L 33 EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 57 71 Dueler H/L 33: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 61
EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 71.3 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/L 33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
60
Handling (owners)
EUROALL SEASON AS210 +565Why this score
Source Dueler H/L 33 EUROALL SEASON AS210 Reviews found online 60 65 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison24Why this score
Source Dueler H/L 33 EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 24
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/L 33 | Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 71 |
| Dry | 66 | 66 |
| Wet | 67 | 77 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 64 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 45 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 65 |
| Efficiency | – | 24 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dueler H/L 33
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dueler H/L 33
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capability
- Reliable grip in both dry and wet road conditions
- Generally quiet operation under standard driving conditions
Cons
- Reports of a harsh, uncomfortable ride quality
- Noticeable road noise in certain conditions
- Perceived lack of steering precision and stability
Tire B EUROALL SEASON AS210
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
- High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
- Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain
Cons
- Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
- Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Dueler H/L 33
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.
Based on 10 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L 33 | B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 92 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ | 13″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L 33
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Winner: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — better treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Dueler H/L 33 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 75 vs 61 on treadwear.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 77 vs 67 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dueler H/L 33 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?
Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/L 33 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 77 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/L 33 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/L 33 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dueler H/L 33 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 75 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology