Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 41 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 41 + 254 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV is ahead, 69–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 254 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV +770Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 60 72 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 63
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70
No road tests of dry for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
67
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV +572Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 66 73 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 67
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 72
No road tests of wet for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 66 – Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68
No road tests of snow for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV +870Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 58 70 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.3 = 62
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 60 – Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 64
No road tests of noise for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus +160Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 58 56 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison70Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV Reviews found online – 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 69 |
| Dry | 63 | 70 |
| Wet | 67 | 72 |
| Snow | 68 | – |
| Comfort | 62 | 70 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 61 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Pros
- Excellent snow traction, including deep snow, steep grades and heavy-snowfall regions (Maine, Vermont, New England, upstate NY, Colorado/Utah, 400 inches annually at 9,000 ft)
- Good ice performance and strong driver confidence and safety in winter storms
- Quiet ride and stable dry-road behavior, including at high speed, with several reviewers noting low road noise
Cons
- Some reviewers consider it pricey, with one saying it 'cost an arm and a leg'
- Reduced fuel economy was reported
- Dry and wet handling and braking are less sharp than all-season tires, with a 'squishy' feel noted
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip with confident cornering and handling
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation on long journeys
- Provides a smooth, comfortable ride compared to original equipment run-flats
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by a minority of drivers on heavy SUVs
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
- Occasional reports of rubber chipping or flaking on edges under demanding use
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 19 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 19″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 A A | 240 AA A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV — better comfort, dry and wet. Where the Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV scores 70 vs 62 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV scores 70 vs 63 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV scores 72 vs 67 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, 70 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, 70 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 60 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology