Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,807 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 4 road tests and 5,807 + 497 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Sport V105 is ahead, 68–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 67 · 497 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
ADVAN Sport V105 +173Why this score
Source Potenza S001 ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests 79 73 Reviews found online 60 74 Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 96% 91% Potenza S001: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 60 = 72
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 73.5 = 73
-
75
Wet
Potenza S001 +372Why this score
Source Potenza S001 ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests 86 72 Reviews found online 60 72 Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 100% 83% Potenza S001: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72 + 40% × 72.4 = 72
-
50
Snow
ADVAN Sport V105 +1060Why this score
Source Potenza S001 ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 38 54 Potenza S001: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 37.6 = 50
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60
No road tests of snow for Potenza S001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
54
Comfort
ADVAN Sport V105 +1367Why this score
Source Potenza S001 ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 63 ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 47 66 Potenza S001: 40% × 63.3 + 60% × 47.2 = 54
ADVAN Sport V105: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67
No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Noise
ADVAN Sport V105 +359Why this score
Source Potenza S001 ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests 56 53 Reviews found online 56 67 Potenza S001: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 55.9 = 56
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 53.1 + 40% × 67.3 = 59
-
52
Treadwear
ADVAN Sport V105 +1466Why this score
Source Potenza S001 ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests 58 70 Reviews found online 43 61 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 54% 62% Potenza S001: 60% × 58 + 40% × 42.8 = 52
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.8 = 66
-
60
Handling (owners)
ADVAN Sport V105 +1272Why this score
Source Potenza S001 ADVAN Sport V105 Reviews found online 60 72 -
41
Efficiency
ADVAN Sport V105 +1859Why this score
Source Potenza S001 ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests 41 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 68 |
| Dry | 72 | 73 |
| Wet | 75 | 72 |
| Snow | 50 | 60 |
| Comfort | 54 | 67 |
| Noise | 56 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 41 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Potenza S001
68
/ 100
ADVAN Sport V105
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Potenza S001 finished ahead 2 times and Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza S001 | ADVAN Sport V105 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% | 91% | +4.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 60% #10/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 94% #4/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% | 83% | +17.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 78% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 80% #9/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 96% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 97% #9/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 54% | 62% | −7.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 73% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 85% #10/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 54% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 57% #6/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/22 | #16/22 | – | 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza S001
Pros
- Precise and sharp steering response
- Strong dry-pavement cornering grip
- Stiff sidewalls providing robust rim protection and high-speed stability
Cons
- High levels of road noise and cabin drone
- Stiff, harsh ride quality (particularly noticeable on run-flat versions)
- Poor or unpredictable wet-weather grip and sudden loss of traction
Tire B ADVAN Sport V105
Pros
- Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet road conditions
- Sharp, responsive steering feel and high cornering stability
- Competitive pricing offering great value relative to flagship alternatives
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly under spirited or track driving
- Noticeable road noise on certain vehicles or rough road surfaces
- Subpar performance and lack of confidence in snow and freezing temperatures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.
r/CarTalkUK
·2 upvotes ·2023-11-15
“Brand New Bridgestone Potenza S001 Tyres worn after 10k mileage? So I got 4 brand new tyres last June from Costco, 255/35 R19. I only drive locally, occasional trips to another city. 10k mileage later, my front two tyres flagged up on my recent MOT as : Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge CHANGE ASAP (5.2.3 (e)) Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge EDGED (5.2.3 (e)) Seems surprising to me as I don't drive crazy, occasional spirited driving. 2011 Audi s5. is this normal? Thinking of getting another brand this time for the front two tyres. Car is a quattro but same types on same axis should suffice? Any recommendations on tyres? Read more”
mybmwi3.com
·2026-03-31
“I run the Bridgestone Potenza S001 Ultra-High Summer Peformance Tire 215/45R/20s on the rear and 195s on the front. They ride softer than stock tires. Not cheap tho.”
svtperformance.com
·2 upvotes ·2023-08-06
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Top themes
#run-flat stiffness and harshness#premature tread wear#tread cracking issues#wet and dry grip#switching to non-run-flats#road noise generation#OEM tire replacement
Based on 43 community posts
Tire B
Mixed
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Community discussions reflect mixed impressions regarding the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, highlighting both praise for its wet and dry handling along with debates surrounding its tread life. While some drivers report surprisingly durable treadwear and good overall value, others cite reports of poor tread life and note that ride comfort and road noise may trail competitor offerings.
northamericanmotoring.com
“Advan Sport V105 does get a good tirerack review: Comes in 205/55-16 (three models. Mercedes W and V speed rated and 2010 Production) $83-86 each Not as comfortable or quiet as other Max Summer tires but handles well in both dry and wet. If you prefer to keep the 205/50-16 tire size then for street use and daily driving with a slightly higher budget: Michelin Premier A/S Grand Touring All Season $132 each 640 treadwear, V speed rated, 19 lbs. Tirerack test result- Good blend of comfort and handling with much longer treadlife.”
r/subaru
·2 upvotes ·2020-03-08
“Tread Life on the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”
Top themes
#tread life longevity#dry and wet handling#comparison to Michelin PS4S#ride comfort and noise#OEM fitment evaluation#daily driving performance
Based on 7 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 55 | 144 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 16″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A A | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 47 | 47 |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza S001
68
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better efficiency, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S001 if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 59 vs 41 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 66 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 67 vs 54 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 72 vs 60 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S001
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza S001 or ADVAN Sport V105?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza S001 or ADVAN Sport V105?
Bridgestone Potenza S001, 75 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S001 or ADVAN Sport V105?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Potenza S001 or ADVAN Sport V105?
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 60 vs 50 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Potenza S001 or ADVAN Sport V105?
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 59 vs 56 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza S001 or ADVAN Sport V105?
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 67 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza S001 or ADVAN Sport V105?
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 66 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Potenza S001 or ADVAN Sport V105?
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 59 vs 41 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology