Tests 80 · 28 tests Owners 63 · 731 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 52 in 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout (dry braking)
“Replacement tires. Bridgestone Potenza Sport. 8k miles. Fronts/Rears. WTF Bridgestone? Or is it me? No burnouts!”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 28 + 18 road tests and 731 + 3,611 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 83–73
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 28 tests Owners 63 · 731 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 52 in 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout (dry braking)
“Replacement tires. Bridgestone Potenza Sport. 8k miles. Fronts/Rears. WTF Bridgestone? Or is it me? No burnouts!”
Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 80 · 3,611 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / 17 tests | 96 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 85 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 98% | 96% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 100% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 90% |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 96.3 + 40% × 74.3 = 87
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 84.7 = 85
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / 17 tests | 95 | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 85 |
| Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 98% | 91% |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 97% | 98% |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 100% | 100% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–0 | 96% | 96% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 99% | 99% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 97% | 97% |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 94.7 + 40% × 72.4 = 86
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.1 + 40% × 85.1 = 89
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 8 tests | 54 | 91 |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 74 |
Potenza Sport: 40% × 53.9 + 60% × 60.8 = 58
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 90.7 + 60% × 74 = 81
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 13 tests | 30 | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 63 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 97% | 99% |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 30 + 40% × 63.1 = 43
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests | 71 | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 40 | 71 |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 39.7 = 59
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 70.9 = 78
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 73 | 84 |
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 14 tests | 10 | 61 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 84% | 92% |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza Sport | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 83 |
| Dry | 87 | 85 |
| Wet | 86 | 89 |
| Comfort | 58 | 81 |
| Noise | 43 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 84 |
| Efficiency | 10 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza Sport
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Potenza Sport finished ahead 3 times and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% | 96% | +2.5 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% | 98% | +1.8 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% | 90% | +10.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% | 91% | +6.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% | 98% | −0.6 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% | 96% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% | 99% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% | 97% | +0.4 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 100% | 100% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 90% #7/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | 89% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 97% | 99% | −1.7 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 88% #6/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 100% #3/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 68% #4/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 84% | 92% | −7.3 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 53% | 55% | −2.2 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #10/10 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | #1/20 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 43% #8/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 97% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 90% #3/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 100% #1/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 98% #5/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 94% #7/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 96% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 100% #1/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 92% #4/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/6 | #3/6 | – | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2021 Sportauto Summer Tire Test for Sportcars R19 · 255/35R19 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community praises the Bridgestone Potenza Sport for its exceptional dry and wet grip, sharp steering response, and value pricing compared to competitors. However, users frequently highlight drawbacks such as fast tread wear and poor durability when used for track days, along with some complaints regarding lower fuel economy and narrower physical dimensions.
“Just replaced my set of Potenza Sport AS. 2 side wall failures with 70% tread left. Replaced them with Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4s. Michelin's are a much better riding tire than the Bridgestones. A little more road noise though.”
“Trying Bridgestone Potenza Sports for summers with simple Spirt Edition A19 wheels Last fall I put Blizzaks WS90s on the stock rims, and had a confident time this winter. I love the stock Mazda rims and intended to swap on a set of performance summer tires. However decide to go with aftermarket wheels that match the stock as much as I could afford, so here they are. 19X8 SPORT EDITION A19 DARK GREY 225/45R-19 BRIDGESTONE POTENZA SPORT I love the look of the new rims maybe even more than the stock now that they are on simple as they are. Will have to see how the tires behave. I may decide to go back to a set of Conti DwS HiPer All-Seasons next year. Read more”
“Bridgestone Potenza Sport Anybody running potenza sports? My rear right tire inside sidewall got shredded suddenly at highway speed (85+ mph). Fortunately I did not lose control and was able to move the car to a nearby school parking lot with a spare. Ordered a set of DWS06+ and they should be delivered tomorrow. The tires are a little more than 4 years old and had about 12k miles on them. Kind of bummed at the situation, but this could’ve been much worse. Are potenza sports generally that bad? Read more”
Based on 93 community posts
Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.
“2024 J1.1 GTS Sport Turismo on 21" Spyder RS wheels here. Went from Pirelli PZero's to NF1 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's recently. They don't seem any louder than the PZero's, dry grip seems about the same, as does comfort. Wet grip and performance in cold conditions (I'm in Scotland, UK) over the PZero's is noticeably better. Very little in the way of the Ackerman effect in cold temperatures, compared to the PZero's which made an awful noise and skipped badly when turning at slow speeds, pulling out of junctions. Will see how they do wear rate wise, PZero's had about 2.5 to 3mm left at 16k miles. Anything approaching that on the ASY5's would be good. Unfortunately on the J1.1 on 21"'s the choice is essentially PZero's or ASY5's. Which is disappointing as I had PS4S's and CSC7's on my previous cars (G81 M3 and M340i Touring) and they were fantastic.”
“I have them fitted in both my cars (Audi A6 and CLK350). Neither had the performance of your AMG but I can confirm they are the best tyres I’ve ever had in terms of grip and feel.”
Based on 13 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza Sport | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 128 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 24″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 10/32″ | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 - 320 A - AA A | 300 - 500 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 48 | 48 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better efficiency, noise and comfort. Where the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 61 vs 10 on efficiency.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 70 vs 43 on noise.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 81 vs 58 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 78 vs 59 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport won 2 of 2 shared dry braking tests.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 89 vs 86 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 87 vs 85 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 70 vs 43 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 81 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 78 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 61 vs 10 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology