tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Hankook Dynapro H/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

ContiCrossContact LX 2 is ahead, 68–53

Check price on Amazon · ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro H/T on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro H/T
Tire BHankook

Dynapro H/T

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +16
    53
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Dynapro H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6945

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 53

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +18
    53
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Dynapro H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7247

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 71

    Dynapro H/T: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 53

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +5
    56
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Dynapro H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5447

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 61

    Dynapro H/T: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 56

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +14
    52
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Dynapro H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6545

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.5 = 66

    Dynapro H/T: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 44.5 = 52

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +18
    53
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Dynapro H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7444

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 71

    Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 69

    Handling (owners)

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +26
    43
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Dynapro H/T
    Reviews found online6943
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Hankook Dynapro H/T
Relative Score 68 53
Dry 69 53
Wet 71 53
Snow 61 56
Comfort 66 52
Treadwear 71 53
Handling (owners) 69 43

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiCrossContact LX 2

± 8

Dynapro H/T

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
  • Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
  • Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
  • Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX 2 review

Tire B Dynapro H/T

Pros

  • Exceptionally low noise levels and quiet ride
  • High comfort and smooth highway performance
  • Balanced wet and dry braking for casual driving

Cons

  • Terrible winter and snow traction due to hard rubber compound
  • Poor wet traction leading to wheel spin on acceleration
  • Severe balancing and out-of-round issues reported by some users
All owner themes in the Dynapro H/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Hankook Dynapro H/T
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available395
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 20″
UTQG—500 - 700 A - B A - B
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Hankook Dynapro H/T

Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro H/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 71 vs 53 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 71 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 53 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro H/T
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro H/T?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro H/T?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 71 vs 53 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro H/T?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 69 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro H/T?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 61 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro H/T?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 66 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro H/T?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 71 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology