Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 28 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Michelin Latitude Cross — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Latitude Cross leads, 71–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Latitude Cross +271Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Latitude Cross Reviews found online 70 73 -
72
Wet
Latitude Cross +375Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Latitude Cross Reviews found online 72 77 -
61
Snow
Latitude Cross +768Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Latitude Cross Reviews found online 55 67 -
68
Comfort
Latitude Cross +270Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Latitude Cross Reviews found online 67 72 -
69
Treadwear
Latitude Cross +271Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Latitude Cross Reviews found online 71 75 -
69
Handling
Latitude Cross +271Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Latitude Cross Reviews found online 69 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Michelin Latitude Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 71 |
| Dry | 69 | 71 |
| Wet | 72 | 75 |
| Snow | 61 | 68 |
| Comfort | 68 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 71 |
| Handling | 69 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiCrossContact LX 2
Latitude Cross
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B Latitude Cross
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and resistance to aquaplaning
- Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
- Strong off-road performance on mud, gravel, and grass
Cons
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to sharp rocks and punctures
- Increased fuel consumption compared to road-biased tires
- Performance degradation and hardening of the rubber compound over long-term aging (5+ years)
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Michelin Latitude Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 39 | 34 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Michelin Latitude Cross
Winner: Michelin Latitude Cross — better snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 68 vs 61 on snow.
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 75 vs 72 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.