Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 41 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 20 road tests and 41 + 18 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC6 leads, 72–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 20 tests Owners 55 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +272Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 77 59 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 58.6 = 72
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
N Fera Sport SU2 +376Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 73 64 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 73
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 64.2 = 76
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +465Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 70 50 ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69
N Fera Sport SU2: 40% × 86.9 + 60% × 49.9 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison83Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 93 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 93.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 83
No owner ratings of noise for N Fera Sport SU2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
64
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1054Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 63 Reviews found online 63 41 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 62.9 + 40% × 41 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1861Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Reviews found online 79 61 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison47Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests – 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 68 |
| Dry | 74 | 72 |
| Wet | 73 | 76 |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 83 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 61 |
| Efficiency | – | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiMaxContact MC6
N Fera Sport SU2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B N Fera Sport SU2
Pros
- Significantly cheaper than premium tier alternatives like Michelin and Continental
- Impressive dry grip and predictable, controllable handling
- Strong wet weather performance and high-speed stability
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, often requiring replacement prematurely
- Stiff carcass leading to mediocre ride comfort and harshness over road imperfections
- Soft rubber compound prone to squirming under hard cornering or experiencing shoulder damage
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Narrow edge: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 if wet matters most to you.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 79 vs 61 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 64 vs 54 on treadwear.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 76 vs 73 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC6 or N Fera Sport SU2?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or N Fera Sport SU2?
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, 76 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or N Fera Sport SU2?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or N Fera Sport SU2?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or N Fera Sport SU2?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 64 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology