Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 40 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Too close to call: ContiMaxContact MC6 and N Fera Sport SU2 are level at 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 20 tests Owners 65 · 18 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
N Fera Sport SU2 +175Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 80 Reviews found online 77 67 -
72
Wet
N Fera Sport SU2 +678Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 83 Reviews found online 73 71 -
70
Comfort
N Fera Sport SU2 +979Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 89 Reviews found online 70 63 -
–
Noise
No comparison85Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 97 -
65
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +560Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 63 Reviews found online 64 56 -
76
Handling
ContiMaxContact MC6 +769Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 N Fera Sport SU2 Reviews found online 76 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 74 | 75 |
| Wet | 72 | 78 |
| Comfort | 70 | 79 |
| Noise | – | 85 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 60 |
| Handling | 76 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ContiMaxContact MC6
N Fera Sport SU2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B N Fera Sport SU2
Pros
- Significantly cheaper than premium tier alternatives like Michelin and Continental
- Impressive dry grip and predictable, controllable handling
- Strong wet weather performance and high-speed stability
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, often requiring replacement prematurely
- Stiff carcass leading to mediocre ride comfort and harshness over road imperfections
- Soft rubber compound prone to squirming under hard cornering or experiencing shoulder damage
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 and Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on handling and treadwear. Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is stronger on comfort and wet.
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 79 vs 70 on comfort.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 69 on handling.
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 78 vs 72 on wet.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 65 vs 60 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.