tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 is discontinued — replaced by Hankook Dynapro HT RH12. Compare Dynapro HT RH12 with ContiProContact

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact vs Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

ContiProContact is ahead, 62–57

Check price on Amazon · ContiProContact or Dynapro AS RH03 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    ContiProContact +8
    56
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6249

    ContiProContact: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 62

    Wet

    ContiProContact +5
    57
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6053

    ContiProContact: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 59

    Snow

    ContiProContact +4
    55
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5145

    ContiProContact: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 59

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    ContiProContact +3
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5648

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 62

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact or Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    ContiProContact +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6751

    ContiProContact: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact or Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    Level
    60
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5656

    ContiProContact: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 60

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    ContiProContact +9
    49
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactDynapro AS RH03
    Reviews found online5849
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiProContactHankook Dynapro AS RH03
Relative Score 62 57
Dry 64 56
Wet 62 57
Snow 59 55
Comfort 62 59
Noise 67 61
Treadwear 60 60
Handling (owners) 58 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiProContact

Dynapro AS RH03

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise
  • Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
  • Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
All owner themes in the ContiProContact review

Tire B Dynapro AS RH03

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available56—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—
Tread depth9 - 12/32″14/32″
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

Winner: Continental ContiProContact — better handling, dry and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiProContact scores 58 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiProContact scores 64 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental ContiProContact scores 67 vs 61 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 57 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact or Dynapro AS RH03?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental ContiProContact, 62 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental ContiProContact, 64 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiProContact or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental ContiProContact, 59 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiProContact or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental ContiProContact, 67 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact or Dynapro AS RH03?

Continental ContiProContact, 62 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact or Dynapro AS RH03?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 60 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology