Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 79 reviews
Continental ContiProContact vs Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 79 + 910 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HT RH12 leads, 66–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Dynapro HT RH12 +367Why this score
Source ContiProContact Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 62 67 ContiProContact: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
62
Wet
Dynapro HT RH12 +567Why this score
Source ContiProContact Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 60 66 ContiProContact: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
59
Snow
Dynapro HT RH12 +160Why this score
Source ContiProContact Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 51 53 ContiProContact: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 59
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60
No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
62
Comfort
Dynapro HT RH12 +567Why this score
Source ContiProContact Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 56 66 ContiProContact: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 62
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
Dynapro HT RH12 +370Why this score
Source ContiProContact Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 75 ContiProContact: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70
No road tests of noise for ContiProContact or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
Dynapro HT RH12 +464Why this score
Source ContiProContact Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 56 64 ContiProContact: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 60
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HT RH12 +765Why this score
Source ContiProContact Dynapro HT RH12 Reviews found online 58 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiProContact | Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 66 |
| Dry | 64 | 67 |
| Wet | 62 | 67 |
| Snow | 59 | 60 |
| Comfort | 62 | 67 |
| Noise | 67 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiProContact
Dynapro HT RH12
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiProContact
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise
- Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers
Cons
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
- Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
- Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
Tire B Dynapro HT RH12
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiProContact
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.
“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”
“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Based on 8 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiProContact | B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 56 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 12/32″ | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A - AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 40,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 54 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiProContact
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 65 vs 58 on handling.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 67 vs 62 on wet.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 67 vs 62 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 64 vs 60 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiProContact or Dynapro HT RH12?
Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 67 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 67 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiProContact or Dynapro HT RH12?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 60 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, ContiProContact or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiProContact or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 64 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology