Tests 86 · 1 test Owners 80 · 50 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 11 road tests and 50 + 251 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact Sport 02 leads, 81–77 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 1 test Owners 80 · 50 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Tests 71 · 11 tests Owners 80 · 251 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 11 tests | 87 | 88 |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 81 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 96% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 96% |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 86 = 86
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 80.7 = 85
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 11 tests | 85 | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 84 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 92% | 89% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 92% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 93% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 96% |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 87.4 = 86
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 83 + 40% × 84 = 83
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 66 | – |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests | ≈ 71 (est.) | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 75 |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 78.5 = 75
Proxes Sport 2: 40% × 71.1 + 60% × 74.8 = 73
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests | ≈ 67 (est.) | 72 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 73 |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 70
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 73.2 = 72
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests | ≈ 70 (est.) | 40 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 78 |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73
Proxes Sport 2: 60% × 39.7 + 40% × 77.8 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 82 | 81 |
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests | – | 48 |
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Toyo Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 77 |
| Dry | 86 | 85 |
| Wet | 86 | 83 |
| Snow | 68 | – |
| Comfort | 75 | 73 |
| Noise | 70 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact Sport 02
Proxes Sport 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 finished ahead 1 times and Toyo Proxes Sport 2 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Proxes Sport 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% | 96% | +4.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% | 98% | +2.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% | 96% | +3.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% | 92% | +7.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% | 93% | +5.6 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% | 96% | +3.6 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 92% | 89% | +2.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Road Rating (tester's mark) | Other | 95% | 87% | +7.6 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/10 | #6/10 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community discussions regarding the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 are relatively limited due to it being a newly released tire, with many users asking for comparisons against established premium options. Owners generally report positive impressions regarding value for money and performance, though some express concerns over faster-than-expected treadwear. Additionally, frequent naming confusion occurs across automotive forums where 'PS2' references the legacy Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 rather than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.
“I have Toyo proxes sport 2 on a mustang gt. Very happy with them. The kumho ecstasy sport s is supposed to be better in every way though. Continental extreme contact sport 2 is one of the best ultra high performance/summer performance available right now but a but more expensive.. Michelin makes excellent tires, but competition is getting tight for them. Hard to justify the price now adays”
“Had conti 2's on my audi s4 and they were downright terrible. Traction was good for about a month and then they just got loud and sloppy. Went to the ps2's after about 15k miles and abosultely loved them. Dry traction was improved greatly as was ride comfort and noise. They only lasted 20,000 miles but well worth the investment. I've never had a good experience with any continental tire so I can't imagine the sc3's being worth a gamble as they are not cheap.”
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money.”
Based on 17 community posts
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 | B · Toyo Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 78 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 - 700 A - AA A | 240 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 57 | 57 |
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
Narrow edge: Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 — better treadwear and wet. Where the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 73 vs 55 on treadwear.
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 86 vs 83 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02, 86 vs 83 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 86 vs 85 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02, 73 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology