Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 33 reviews
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat vs Continental SportContact 7 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 22 road tests and 33 + 1,605 owner reviews. How we score
SportContact 7 is ahead, 85–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 83 · 22 tests Owners 79 · 1,605 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
SportContact 7 +2894Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 99 Reviews found online 64 88 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66
SportContact 7: 60% × 98.7 + 40% × 88.1 = 94
No road tests of dry for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
65
Wet
SportContact 7 +2691Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 64 85 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65
SportContact 7: 60% × 94.4 + 40% × 85.2 = 91
No road tests of wet for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
58
Comfort
SportContact 7 +563Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 56 Reviews found online 48 73 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 58
SportContact 7: 60% × 56.4 + 40% × 73.4 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison62Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests – 59 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) SportContact 7: 60% × 59.1 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 62
No owner ratings of noise for SportContact 7. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
50
Treadwear
SportContact 7 +1969Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 57 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 39 65 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.8 = 50
SportContact 7: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 64.7 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
61
Handling (owners)
SportContact 7 +2586Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 7 Reviews found online 61 86
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat | Continental SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 85 |
| Dry | 66 | 94 |
| Wet | 65 | 91 |
| Comfort | 58 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
SportContact 7
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with responsive handling
- Precise steering feedback and cornering stability
- Acts as a reliable, secure OEM choice for European sport sedans and SUVs
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
- Firm, harsh ride quality that transmits impacts over rough roads and potholes
- Elevated road noise as the tires age
Tire B SportContact 7
Pros
- Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
- Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
- Strong braking performance and high stability at speed
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
- Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
- Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental SportContact 7
Community members widely praise the Continental SportContact 7 for outstanding dry and wet grip, sharp steering precision, and strong value compared to key rivals like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. However, users frequently highlight faster tread wear, reduced initial tread depth, and occasional issues with road noise and comfort as main drawbacks.
“I have the Conti SportContact 7 as summer tires on my 500hp M2 Competition. Brilliant tire, tons of grip and very direct steering, and needs much less time to get up to temp than the 4S the car came on when I got it. I can't speak for the 5 but it's definitely a stiffer tire compound than the SC7 so it will last longer but will take more time to get up to temp and also less grippy.”
“US doesn't have the PS5 or PS5S yet but the 4s and 4 were top performing for years and still are. Sport contact 7 would be my 2nd choice.”
“Last week I fitted brand new tyres on my '03 Z4, replaced the worn GY asymmetric 6's with Conti SC7 and I'm not pleased at all. The car also has recently installed new KW V1's, already driven on the old GY's. Now it just feels chewy in the corners. The tires have a few 100km already. Anyone else disappointed with Conti SC7? Any suggestion on tyre pressures? They filled the tyres 2,5 bar all around, later I left out some air just on the front tyres, but still unhappy. I just don't trust the car in the corners.”
Based on 114 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat | B · Continental SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 123 |
| Rim diameters | — | 18″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Continental SportContact 7
Winner: Continental SportContact 7 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental SportContact 7 scores 94 vs 66 on dry.
Continental SportContact 7 scores 91 vs 65 on wet.
Continental SportContact 7 scores 86 vs 61 on handling.
Continental SportContact 7 scores 69 vs 50 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or SportContact 7?
Which is better in the wet, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 91 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 94 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 63 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 69 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology