Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 34 reviews
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 18 road tests and 34 + 3,619 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 85–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 80 · 3,619 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2385Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 60 85 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 84.7 = 85
No road tests of dry for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
61
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2889Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 92 Reviews found online 57 85 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.2 + 40% × 85.1 = 89
No road tests of wet for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
50
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +3181Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 91 Reviews found online 41 74 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 40% × 63.1 (est.) + 60% × 40.9 = 50
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 90.6 + 60% × 73.9 = 81
No road tests of comfort for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests – 73 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
44
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +3478Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 53 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 29 71 Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 53.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.4 = 44
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 71 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
55
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2984Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Reviews found online 55 84 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison61Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 85 |
| Dry | 62 | 85 |
| Wet | 61 | 89 |
| Comfort | 50 | 81 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 44 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 84 |
| Efficiency | – | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with responsive handling
- Precise steering feedback and cornering stability
- Acts as a reliable, secure OEM choice for European sport sedans and SUVs
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
- Firm, harsh ride quality that transmits impacts over rough roads and potholes
- Elevated road noise as the tires age
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Precise steering response and high-speed stability
- Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
- Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
“I have them fitted in both my cars (Audi A6 and CLK350). Neither had the performance of your AMG but I can confirm they are the best tyres I’ve ever had in terms of grip and feel.”
Based on 13 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 - 500 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 78 vs 44 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 81 vs 50 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 84 vs 55 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 89 vs 61 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
Which is better in the wet, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 89 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 85 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 81 vs 50 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 78 vs 44 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology