Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental SportContact 7 vs Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 22 + 0 road tests and 1,629 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

SportContact 7 is ahead, 88–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental SportContact 7
± 4

Tests 84 · 22 tests Owners 83 · 1,629 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37
Tire BKumho

Ecsta XT KU37

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 97

    Dry

    SportContact 7 +42
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ecsta XT KU37
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / – tests100≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online9248

    SportContact 7: 60% × 99.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 97

    Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 95

    Wet

    SportContact 7 +39
    56
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ecsta XT KU37
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests96≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online9351

    SportContact 7: 60% × 95.5 + 40% × 93.3 = 95

    Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.9 = 56

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Comfort

    SportContact 7 +15
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ecsta XT KU37
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests56≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7949

    SportContact 7: 40% × 55.8 + 60% × 78.8 = 70

    Ecsta XT KU37: 40% × 64.7 (est.) + 60% × 48.8 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ecsta XT KU37
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests59–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    SportContact 7: 60% × 59.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for SportContact 7. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 69

    Treadwear

    SportContact 7 +14
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ecsta XT KU37
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6448

    SportContact 7: 60% × 72 + 40% × 63.9 = 69

    Ecsta XT KU37: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta XT KU37. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 91

    Handling (owners)

    SportContact 7 +44
    47
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ecsta XT KU37
    Reviews found online9147
  7. 72

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ecsta XT KU37
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / – tests72–
Scores at a glance
Continental SportContact 7 vs Kumho Ecsta XT KU37: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental SportContact 7Kumho Ecsta XT KU37
Relative Score 88 55
Dry 97 55
Wet 95 56
Comfort 70 55
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 69 55
Handling (owners) 91 47
Efficiency 72 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

SportContact 7

± 8

Ecsta XT KU37

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SportContact 7

Pros

  • Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Strong braking performance and high stability at speed

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
  • Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
  • Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the SportContact 7 review

Tire B Ecsta XT KU37

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise levels
  • Good dry-weather stability and cornering

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather grip and confidence
  • Lack of steering feedback and road feel
  • Tendency to lose traction under hard acceleration
All owner themes in the Ecsta XT KU37 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental SportContact 7

Positive

The community generally regards the SportContact 7 as an excellent ultra-high-performance tire, praised for exceptional dry and wet grip, direct steering, quick warm-up, and good rim protection. Many rank it at or above the Michelin PS4S and ahead of the PS5 and Goodyear Asymmetric 6 for outright performance. The main criticisms are fast tread wear (often about 10–15k miles), low starting tread depth, softer sidewalls, some tramlining and noise, and poor durability on track.

Top themes
#Exceptional grip#Fast tread wear#Comparison with PS4S#Wet performance#Track durability#Comfort and noise#Rim protection#PremiumContact 7 alternative

Based on 115 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental SportContact 7 B · Kumho Ecsta XT KU37
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available123—
Rim diameters18″ – 24″—
Tread depth8 - 9/32″—
UTQG240 AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental SportContact 7

Kumho Ecsta XT KU37

Winner: Continental SportContact 7 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental SportContact 7 scores 91 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental SportContact 7 scores 97 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental SportContact 7 scores 95 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental SportContact 7 scores 70 vs 55 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental SportContact 7
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta XT KU37

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SportContact 7 or Ecsta XT KU37?

Which is better in the wet, SportContact 7 or Ecsta XT KU37?

Continental SportContact 7, 95 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SportContact 7 or Ecsta XT KU37?

Continental SportContact 7, 97 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SportContact 7 or Ecsta XT KU37?

Continental SportContact 7, 70 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SportContact 7 or Ecsta XT KU37?

Continental SportContact 7, 69 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology