tirewheelguide

Toyo NanoEnergy R38 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 18 + 0 road tests and 1,263 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

EUROALL SEASON AS210 leads, 73–70 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · EUROALL SEASON AS210 or NanoEnergy R38 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

Tests 70 · 18 tests Owners 70 · 1,263 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”

Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Tire BToyo

NanoEnergy R38

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    NanoEnergy R38 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests67≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6872

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 68 = 68

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 78

    Wet

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests81≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7373

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 73.2 = 78

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72

    No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 66

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests64–
    Reviews found online70–

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64 + 40% × 69.7 = 66

  4. 71

    Comfort

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6769

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 67 = 71

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 46

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests31–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 31.3 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 46

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests75≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7165

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 75.1 + 40% × 71.2 = 74

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    NanoEnergy R38 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210NanoEnergy R38
    Reviews found online6871
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Relative Score 73 70
Dry 68 71
Wet 78 72
Snow 66 –
Comfort 71 69
Noise 46 –
Treadwear 74 65
Handling (owners) 68 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

EUROALL SEASON AS210

NanoEnergy R38

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

Tire B NanoEnergy R38

Pros

  • Reliable wet and dry grip with predictable handling limits
  • Good value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Solid longevity and mileage, with respectable tread wear reported

Cons

  • Slightly increased road noise reported by some users
  • Limited size or availability challenges noted by consumers wanting replacements
All owner themes in the NanoEnergy R38 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

r/CarTalkUK ·13 upvotes ·2021-08-19

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”
Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Toyo NanoEnergy R38

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available92—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Toyo NanoEnergy R38

Narrow edge: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Toyo NanoEnergy R38 if dry matters most to you. Toyo NanoEnergy R38 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 74 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 78 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 71 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS210 or NanoEnergy R38?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or NanoEnergy R38?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 78 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or NanoEnergy R38?

Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or NanoEnergy R38?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or NanoEnergy R38?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 74 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology