tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Yokohama Geolandar G98A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 19 + 0 road tests and 1,272 + 15 owner reviews. How we score

EUROALL SEASON AS210 is ahead, 71–51

Check price on Amazon · EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Geolandar G98A on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 19 tests Owners 68 · 1,272 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +13
    52
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests66≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6444

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 64 = 65

    Geolandar G98A: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 52

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G98A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 77

    Wet

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +21
    56
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests82≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7051

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.4 = 77

    Geolandar G98A: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 56

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G98A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests64–
    Reviews found online66–

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.3 = 65

  4. 67

    Comfort

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +18
    49
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests78≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6140

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 77.5 + 60% × 60.7 = 67

    Geolandar G98A: 40% × 62.9 (est.) + 60% × 39.9 = 49

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G98A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 48

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests36–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 48

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +31
    44
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests77≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online7230

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.1 = 75

    Geolandar G98A: 60% × 53.2 (est.) + 40% × 29.6 = 44

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G98A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +20
    46
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
    Reviews found online6646
  8. 20

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests20–
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Yokohama Geolandar G98A
Relative Score 71 51
Dry 65 52
Wet 77 56
Snow 65 –
Comfort 67 49
Noise 48 –
Treadwear 75 44
Handling (owners) 66 46
Efficiency 20 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

± 8

Geolandar G98A

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

Tire B Geolandar G98A

Pros

  • Satisfactory dry-road grip and handling
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Decent fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear
  • Poor traction and instability in wet conditions
  • Unsafe performance in snow and icy environments
All owner themes in the Geolandar G98A review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

r/CarTalkUK ·1 upvote ·2022-09-08

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”
Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Geolandar G98A

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available92—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Yokohama Geolandar G98A

Winner: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G98A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 75 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 77 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 66 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 67 vs 49 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Geolandar G98A?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Geolandar G98A?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 77 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Geolandar G98A?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 65 vs 52 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Geolandar G98A?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 67 vs 49 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Geolandar G98A?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 75 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology