Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK510 SUV vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 9 + 213 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus S1 evo 3 ev leads, 73–71 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK510 SUV
Tire AFalken

FK510 SUV

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 64 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    FK510 SUV +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVVentus S1 evo 3 ev
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests82≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6575

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 65.1 = 75

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 77

    Wet

    FK510 SUV +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVVentus S1 evo 3 ev
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests81≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7274

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 71.6 = 77

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Comfort

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVVentus S1 evo 3 ev
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests61≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6069

    FK510 SUV: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 60.4 = 61

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.3 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVVentus S1 evo 3 ev
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 60

    Treadwear

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev +12
    72
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVVentus S1 evo 3 ev
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5575

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus S1 evo 3 ev +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVVentus S1 evo 3 ev
    Reviews found online6774
  7. 44

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVVentus S1 evo 3 ev
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests44–
Scores at a glance
Falken FK510 SUV vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken FK510 SUVHankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev
Relative Score 71 73
Dry 75 73
Wet 77 73
Comfort 61 69
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 60 72
Handling (owners) 67 74
Efficiency 44 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

FK510 SUV

± 8

Ventus S1 evo 3 ev

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK510 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
  • Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
  • Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
  • Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
All owner themes in the FK510 SUV review

Tire B Ventus S1 evo 3 ev

Pros

  • Low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Good dry and wet grip for daily driving
  • High efficiency and positive impact on EV battery range

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some heavy-footed drivers
  • Occasional loss of grip or slipping in wet, slimy, or cold conditions
  • High retail price point
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo 3 ev review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK510 SUV B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Sizes available4825
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 22″
UTQG—240 - 380 A A
Sizes in common1818

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK510 SUV

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev

Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Falken FK510 SUV if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev scores 72 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev scores 74 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken FK510 SUV scores 77 vs 73 on wet.

Tire A · Falken FK510 SUV
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

FK510 SUV or Ventus S1 evo 3 ev?

Which is better in the wet, FK510 SUV or Ventus S1 evo 3 ev?

Falken FK510 SUV, 77 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, FK510 SUV or Ventus S1 evo 3 ev?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, FK510 SUV or Ventus S1 evo 3 ev?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, FK510 SUV or Ventus S1 evo 3 ev?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev, 72 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology